Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1007/S11336-013-9322-8 | ||||
| Año | 2013 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
In this paper, we study the identification of a particular case of the 3PL model, namely when the discrimination parameters are all constant and equal to 1. We term this model, 1PL-G model. The identification analysis is performed under three different specifications. The first specification considers the abilities as unknown parameters. It is proved that the item parameters and the abilities are identified if a difficulty parameter and a guessing parameter are fixed at zero. The second specification assumes that the abilities are mutually independent and identically distributed according to a distribution known up to the scale parameter. It is shown that the item parameters and the scale parameter are identified if a guessing parameter is fixed at zero. The third specification corresponds to a semi-parametric 1PL-G model, where the distribution G generating the abilities is a parameter of interest. It is not only shown that, after fixing a difficulty parameter and a guessing parameter at zero, the item parameters are identified, but also that under those restrictions the distribution G is not identified. It is finally shown that, after introducing two identification restrictions, either on the distribution G or on the item parameters, the distribution G and the item parameters are identified provided an infinite quantity of items is available.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAN MARTIN-GUTIERREZ, ERNESTO JAVIER | Hombre |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Measurement Center MIDE UC - Chile CEPPE-UC - Chile |
| 2 | Rolin, Jean-Marie | Hombre |
Catholic Univ Louvain - Bélgica
Université catholique de Louvain - Bélgica |
| 3 | CASTRO-CEPERO, LUIS MAURICIO | Hombre |
Universidad de Concepción - Chile
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Anillo |
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| Chilean Government |
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo CientÃfico y Tecnológico |
| ANILLO Project from the Chilean Gouvernment |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The work developed in this paper was presented in a Symposium on Identification Problems in Psychometrics at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society IMPS 2009. The meeting was held in Cambridge (UK), in July 2009. The first author gratefully acknowledges the partial financial support from the ANILLO Project SOC1107 from the Chilean Gouvernment. The third author acknowledges the partial financial support from the Grant FONDECYT 11100076 from Chilean Government. The authors gratefully acknowledge several discussions with Claudio Fernandez (Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile) and Paul De Boeck (University of Amsterdam). This paper benefited from the helpful suggestions of three anonymous referees and the associate editor. In particular, one of the questions proposed by a referee led us to correct an error in a conclusion of Theorem 2. |
| The work developed in this paper was presented in a Symposium on Identification Problems in Psychometrics at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society IMPS 2009. The meeting was held in Cambridge (UK), in July 2009. The first author gratefully acknowledges the partial financial support from the ANILLO Project SOC1107 from the Chilean Gouvern-ment. The third author acknowledges the partial financial support from the Grant FONDECYT 11100076 from Chilean Government. The authors gratefully acknowledge several discussions with Claudio Fernández (Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile) and Paul De Boeck (University of Amsterdam). This paper benefited from the helpful suggestions of three anonymous referees and the associate editor. In particular, one of the questions proposed by a referee led us to correct an error in a conclusion of Theorem 2. |