Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||||
| DOI | 10.4067/S0716-078X2013000300001 | ||||||
| Año | 2013 | ||||||
| Tipo | revisión |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
More than half a century ago Whittaker proposed that the regional diversity (gamma) could be divided into two components: alpha and beta. Over the years two basic ways to relate these three compontens of species diversity emerged: an additive and a multiplicative method. Both methods of diversity partitioning differ in their properties, expressions and interpretations, and have been increasingly used to analyze patterns of alpha and beta diversity across multiple scales. Recently, important contributions have been generated on the properties, uses and limitations of these methods. The purpose of this paper is to review the evolution of the concepts of partitioning gamma diversity components, through additive and multiplicative forms, making a synthesis of the conceptual and methodological framework of both approaches. As a conclusion, if the aim of the study is to measure the true diversity, we should use the multiplicative diversity partitioning method. Diversity partitioning methods are an important part of the study of diversity in heterogeneous landscapes, and its results can be used for decision making in conservation biology.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pereyra, Laura C. | Mujer |
UNIV NACL SALTA - Argentina
Universidad Nacional de Jujuy - Argentina Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina |
| 2 | Moreno, Claudia E. | Mujer |
Univ Autonoma Estado Hidalgo - México
Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo - México |