Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1505/146554819827293196 | ||||
| Año | 2019 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montreal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers' commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montreal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laclau, Pablo | Hombre |
Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr - Argentina
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria Buenos Aires - Argentina |
| 2 | Meza, A. | Hombre |
Corporac Nacl Forestal - Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile Corporación Nacional Forestal Ministerio de Agricultura - Chile |
| 3 | Soares De Lima, J. Garrido | - |
Minist Ganaderia Agr & Pesca - Uruguay
Ministerio de Ganadería - Uruguay |
| 4 | Linser, S. | - |
Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci - Austria
European Forest Inst - Austria Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien - Austria Forest Policy Research Network - Austria |
| Fuente |
|---|
| of Ecosystems and Environment, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering |
| College of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State University |
| Pontifical Catholic University of Chile |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| aInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Mascardi 535, San Martín de los Andes, Neuquén, Argentina bCorporación Nacional Forestal, Paseo Bulnes 285 Of. 803, Santiago, Chile cDepartment of Ecosystems and Environment, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Avda Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile dDirección General Forestal del Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Cerrito 318, Montevideo, Uruguay eInstitute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria fEuropean Forest Institute, Forest Policy Research Network, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria |