Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
Indexado
WoS WOS:000490548800004
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85073713002
DOI 10.1505/146554819827293196
Año 2019
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montreal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers' commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montreal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Forestry
Scopus
Forestry
Ecology
Geography, Planning And Development
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Laclau, Pablo Hombre Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr - Argentina
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria Buenos Aires - Argentina
2 Meza, A. Hombre Corporac Nacl Forestal - Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Corporación Nacional Forestal Ministerio de Agricultura - Chile
3 Soares De Lima, J. Garrido - Minist Ganaderia Agr & Pesca - Uruguay
Ministerio de Ganadería - Uruguay
4 Linser, S. - Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci - Austria
European Forest Inst - Austria
Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien - Austria
Forest Policy Research Network - Austria

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
of Ecosystems and Environment, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering
College of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State University
Pontifical Catholic University of Chile

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
aInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Mascardi 535, San Martín de los Andes, Neuquén, Argentina bCorporación Nacional Forestal, Paseo Bulnes 285 Of. 803, Santiago, Chile cDepartment of Ecosystems and Environment, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Avda Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile dDirección General Forestal del Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Cerrito 318, Montevideo, Uruguay eInstitute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria fEuropean Forest Institute, Forest Policy Research Network, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.