Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1038/NATURE13681 | ||||
| Año | 2014 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
On 1 April 2014, Northern Chile was struck by a magnitude 8.1 earthquake following a protracted series of foreshocks. The Integrated Plate Boundary Observatory Chile monitored the entire sequence of events, providing unprecedented resolution of the build-up to the main event and its rupture evolution. Here we show that the Iquique earthquake broke a central fraction of the so-called northern Chile seismic gap, the last major segment of the South American plate boundary that had not ruptured in the past century(1,2). Since July 2013 three seismic clusters, each lasting a few weeks, hit this part of the plate boundary with earthquakes of increasing peak magnitudes. Starting with the second cluster, geodetic observations show surface displacements that can be associated with slip on the plate interface. These seismic clusters and their slip transients occupied a part of the plate interface that was transitional between a fully locked and a creeping portion. Leading up to this earthquake, the b value of the foreshocks gradually decreased during the years before the earthquake, reversing its trend a few days before the Iquique earthquake. The mainshock finally nucleated at the northern end of the foreshock area, which skirted a locked patch, and ruptured mainly downdip towards higher locking. Peak slip was attained immediately downdip of the foreshock region and at the margin of the locked patch. We conclude that gradual weakening of the central part of the seismic gap accentuated by the foreshock activity in a zone of intermediate seismic coupling was instrumental in causing final failure, distinguishing the Iquique earthquake from most great earthquakes. Finally, only one-third of the gap was broken and the remaining locked segments nowpose a significant, increased seismic hazard with the potential to host an earthquake with a magnitude of > 8.5.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schurr, Bernd | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 2 | Asch, G. | - |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 3 | Hainzl, Sebastian | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 4 | Bedford, Jonathan | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 5 | Hoechner, Andreas | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 6 | Palo, Mauro | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 7 | Wang, Rongjiang | - |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 8 | MORENO-SWITT, MARCOS | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 9 | Bartsch, Mitja | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 10 | Zhang, Y. | - |
Peking Univ - China
|
| 11 | Oncken, Onno | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 12 | Tilmann, Frederik | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 13 | Dahm, T. | Hombre |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 14 | Victor, Pia | - |
German Res Ctr Geosci - Alemania
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) - Alemania |
| 15 | BARRIENTOS-PARRA, SERGIO EDUARDO | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 16 | Vilotte, Jean-Pierre | Hombre |
Inst Phys Globe Paris - Francia
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris - Francia |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam - Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ |
| GFZ |
| Hannover Re |
| Hazard Assessment and Risk Team |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| Data used in this study come from the IPOC initiative (http://www.ipoc-network.org) operated by the GFZ - German Research Centre for Geosciences, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Centro Sismologico National, Universidad de Chile, and Universidad Catolica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile. We also acknowledge the French-Chilean International Associated Laboratory (LIA) 'Montessus de Ballore' and the USA-Chilean Central Andean Tectonic Observatory Geodetic Array projects for giving access to data of several of their continuous GPS (cGPS) stations in Chile. Part of this work was made possible by the Hazard Assessment and Risk Team (HART) initiative funded by the GFZ and Hannover Re. |
| Acknowledgements Data used in this study come from the IPOC initiative (http:// www.ipoc-network.org) operated by the GFZ – German Research Centre for Geosciences, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Centro Sismológico National, Universidad de Chile, and Universidad Cátolica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile. We also acknowledge the French–Chilean InternationalAssociatedLaboratory(LIA)‘Montessus de Ballore’ and the USA–Chilean Central Andean Tectonic Observatory Geodetic Array projects for giving access to data of several of their continuous GPS (cGPS) stations in Chile. Part of this work was made possible by the Hazard Assessment and Risk Team (HART) initiative funded by the GFZ and Hannover Re. |