Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1007/S11116-018-9882-7 | ||||
| Año | 2019 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Travel model systems often adopt a single decision structure that links several activity-travel choices together. The single decision structure is then used to predict activity-travel choices, with those downstream in the decision-making chain influenced by those upstream in the sequence. The adoption of a singular sequential causal structure to depict relationships among activity-travel choices in travel demand model systems ignores the possibility that some choices are made jointly as a bundle as well as the possible presence of structural heterogeneity in the population with respect to decision-making processes. As different segments in the population may adopt and follow different causal decision-making mechanisms when making selected choices jointly, it would be of value to develop simultaneous equations model systems relating multiple endogenous choice variables that are able to identify population subgroups following alternative causal decision structures. Because the segments are not known a priori, they are considered latent and determined endogenously within a joint modeling framework proposed in this paper. The methodology is applied to a national mobility survey data set to identify population segments that follow different causal structures relating residential location choice, vehicle ownership, and car-share and mobility service usage. It is found that the model revealing three distinct latent segments best describes the data, confirming the efficacy of the modeling approach and the existence of structural heterogeneity in decision-making in the population. Future versions of activity-travel model systems should strive to incorporate such structural heterogeneity to better reflect varying decision processes across population subgroups.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASTROZA-TAGLE, SEBASTIAN | Hombre |
Univ Texas Austin - Estados Unidos
Universidad de Concepción - Chile The University of Texas at Austin - Estados Unidos Cockrell School of Engineering - Estados Unidos |
| 2 | Garikapati, Venu M. | - |
Natl Renewable Energy Lab - Estados Unidos
National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Estados Unidos |
| 3 | Pendyala, Ram M. | Hombre |
Arizona State Univ - Estados Unidos
Arizona State University - Estados Unidos Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering - Estados Unidos |
| 4 | Bhat, Chandra R. | Hombre |
Univ Texas Austin - Estados Unidos
Hong Kong Polytech Univ - China The University of Texas at Austin - Estados Unidos Hong Kong Polytechnic University - Hong Kong Hong Kong Polytechnic University - China The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - Hong Kong Cockrell School of Engineering - Estados Unidos |
| 5 | Mokhtarian, Patricia L. | Mujer |
Georgia Inst Technol - Estados Unidos
Georgia Institute of Technology - Estados Unidos College of Engineering - Estados Unidos |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks (TOMNET) |
| US Department of Transportation |
| Data-Supported Transportation Operations and Planning (D-STOP) Center |
| U.S. Department of Transportation |
| Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks |
| Data-Supported Transportation Operations and Planning (D-STOP |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This research was partially supported by the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks (TOMNET) as well as the Data-Supported Transportation Operations and Planning (D-STOP) Center, both of which are Tier 1 University Transportation Centers sponsored by the US Department of Transportation (Grant Nos. 69A3551747116 and DTRT13-G-UTC58). The authors are grateful to Lisa Macias for her help in formatting this document. The authors thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and input that greatly improved the paper. |
| This research was partially supported by the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks (TOMNET) as well as the Data-Supported Transportation Operations and Planning (D-STOP) Center, both of which are Tier 1 University Transportation Centers sponsored by the US Department of Transportation (Grant Nos. 69A3551747116 and DTRT13-G-UTC58). The authors are grateful to Lisa Macias for her help in formatting this document. The authors thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and input that greatly improved the paper. |