Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.ANIREPROSCI.2015.03.010 | ||||
| Año | 2015 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
This paper compares the effects of exposure to exogenous melatonin (MEL), short days (SD, 8 h of light) and long days (LD, 16 h of light), on reproductive activity, sperm motility and other reproductive variables, in Blanca Andaluza bucks. Fourteen males were spilt into two groups of seven animals (G1 and G2). They were subjected to five alternations of 2 months of LD followed by 2 months of SD or MEL before the experimental period of three consecutive intervals of: (1) 2 months of SD (G1,N=7) or MEL (G2, N=7); (2) 2 months of LD (G1 + G2, N=14); and (3) 2 months of SD (G2, N=7) or MEL (G1, N=7). Plasma testosterone concentration, live weight, testicular weight and fresh semen quality were determined weekly. Semen was also cooled and frozen-thawed every fortnight, and the same quality variables measured as for fresh sperm. When the bucks were under LD treatment, the testosterone concentration was lower than when under MEL or SD treatment (P<0.01); values for the semen concentration and total number of sperm per ejaculate were also higher (P<0.001). No differences were observed between the MEL and SD treatments in terms of fresh, cooled or frozen-thawed sperm quality. Only some quality variables on fresh semen were improved by MEL and SD treatment (P<0.05). In conclusion the results of the present experiment showed that MEL improved the fresh semen motility variables, but this did not improve the motility of frozen-thawed sperm over that recorded for either SD or LD treatment. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallego-Calvo, Lourdes | Mujer |
Univ Huelva - España
Universidad de Huelva - España |
| 2 | GATICA-JORQUERA, MARIA CAROLINA | Mujer |
Universidad Arturo Prat - Chile
|
| 3 | SANTIAGO- MORENO, JULIAN | Hombre |
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - España
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España CSIC-INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España |
| 4 | GUZMAN-GUERRERO, JOSE LUIS | Hombre |
Univ Huelva - España
Universidad de Huelva - España |
| 5 | Zarazaga, Luis A. | Hombre |
Univ Huelva - España
Universidad de Huelva - España |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología |
| Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y TecnologÃa |
| Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias-Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (I.N.I.A.-C.I.C.Y.T., Spain) |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The authors thank the Asociacion Nacional de Criadores de Ganado Caprino de Raza Blanca Andaluza (ABLANSE) for supplying the animals used. This study was funded by Grant RZ2010-00001-00-00 from the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias-Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (I.N.I.A.-C.I.C.Y.T., Spain). The authors are grateful to CEVA Salud Animal, Barcelona, Spain, for providing the Melovine (R) implants. |
| The authors thank the Asociación Nacional de Criadores de Ganado Caprino de Raza Blanca Andaluza (ABLANSE) for supplying the animals used. This study was funded by Grant RZ2010-00001-00-00 from the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias-Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (I.N.I.A.-C.I.C.Y.T., Spain). The authors are grateful to CEVA Salud Animal, Barcelona, Spain, for providing the Melovine® implants. |