Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1111/BLAR.12364 | ||||
| Año | 2015 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
In this article we examine the presence of bias in Chile's two main daily newspapers, El Mercurio and La Tercera, both of which have historically been associated with the political right. We analyse their principal headlines in the first 100 days of rule of presidents Eduardo Frei (1994-2000), Ricardo Lagos (2000-2006), Michelle Bachelet (2006-2010) and Sebastian Pinera (2010-2014). We find that La Tercera was more critical of all these presidents than El Mercurio. In La Tercera we also identify an ideological bias in favour of Pinera as compared to the centre-left presidents, and in El Mercurio a greater bias against Bachelet than the other presidents.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAVIA-LUCERO, PATRICIO DANIEL | Hombre |
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
|
| 2 | OSORIO-FLORES, RODRIGO ANDRES | Hombre |
Universidad de Santiago de Chile - Chile
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (CONICYT/FONDAP) |
| Chile's Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT) |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This paper was partially funded by Chile's Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT #1140072) and the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (CONICYT/FONDAP #15130009). A descriptive analysis of the same dataset was published in Navia et al. (2013). We thank R. Bradley for translating the article into English. |