Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
A defence of participation income
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1017/S0143814X15000215 | ||||
| Año | 2016 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Abstract
This article offers a novel defence of participation income (PI). It claims that there are pragmatic and normative reasons to prefer PI over alternative redistributive policies, such as an unconditional basic income and workfare programmes. In particular, it argues that PI should be conceived as a particular type of civic service programme designed to address a large number of unmet social needs that are not met by entrepreneurs in the marketplace. The article ends by addressing five objections that can be raised against its argument.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perez-Munoz, Cristian | Hombre |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The author is grateful to Randy Calvert, Jurgen De Wispelaere, Clarissa Hayward, Frank Lovett, Ian MacMullen, Joshua Potter, Michael Sherraden and Stuart White for their comments, suggestions and criticisms on previous drafts of this article. In addition, the author wants to extend special thanks to JPP editor Andy Whitford and the four anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback. The final stages of manuscript preparation were funded by project RS130002, Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio, Ministry of Economy, Development and Tourism. |
