Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1177/1866802X1600800302 | ||||
| Año | 2016 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Conventional wisdom suggests Chile's party system is highly institutionalized. However, recent declines in participation and partisanship have begun to raise questions about this veneer of stability. This article assesses the current state of the Chilean party system, analyzing its ability to provide linkage. We specify a theoretical framework for identifying challenges to linkage and constraints on necessary adaptation. We then use this framework to evaluate linkage in the contemporary Chilean system, emphasizing how its representational profile has changed since the democratic transition. The analysis suggests the two partisan coalitions no longer present clear policy alternatives and programmatic representation increasingly depends on policy responsiveness and relics of old ideological divides. Significant institutional constraints impede parties' ability to incorporate demands from emerging social groups, and clientelism remains a complementary but not core linkage mechanism. This evidence indicates that while representation in Chile has not yet failed, the system contains serious vulnerabilities.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan, Jana | Mujer |
UNIV TENNESSEE - Estados Unidos
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Estados Unidos |
| 2 | Melendez, Carlos | Hombre |
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| United States Agency for International Development |
| Vanderbilt University |
| University of Tennessee |
| Fondecyt Regular Project |
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
| Inter-American Development Bank |
| Chilean Millennium Science Initiative |
| University of North Carolina Wilmington |
| Fulbright-Hays program |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers as well as Fernando Rosenblatt, Claudio Fuentes, Rossana Castiglioni, Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser, Peter Siavelis, Ken Roberts, and other participants in the workshop on Challenges to Democratic Representation in Chile for their helpful comments and suggestions. The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Chilean Millennium Science Initiative (project NS130008). Melendez also acknowledges support from FONDECYT Regular Project 1161262, and Morgan acknowledges support from the Fulbright-Hays program as well as the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Tennessee. The authors thank the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) and its major supporters (the United States Agency for International Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, and Vanderbilt University) for making the AmericasBarometer data available. |
| The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers as well as Fernando Rosenblatt, Claudio Fuentes, Rossana Castiglioni, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Peter Siavelis, Ken Roberts, and other participants in the workshop on Challenges to Democratic Representation in Chile for their helpful comments and suggestions. The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Chilean Millennium Science Initiative (project NS130008). Meléndez also acknowledges support from FONDECYT(Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico) Regular Project 1161262, and Morgan acknowledges support from the Fulbright-Hays program as well as the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Tennessee. The authors thank the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) and its major supporters (the United States Agency for International Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, and Vanderbilt University) for making the AmericasBarometer data available. |