Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2016.10.022 | ||||
| Año | 2017 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Soil enzyme activities have been long used as indicators of soil contamination, and their integration into numerical indexes of microbial functional diversity is a practical approach in the environmental risk assessment of soil pollutants. However, suitable numerical indexes need to be developed and standardized for monitoring deterioration of soil quality by agrochemicals. Herein, a mesocosm study was performed to examine short-term responses of selected soil enzyme activities to chlorpyrifos (Lorsban (R) 4E). Hydrolases (carboxylesterase, acid phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, urease and protease) and oxidoreductases (dehydrogenase and catalase) were measured in Andisols 14 d after an application with two doses (4.8 and 24 kg a.i. ha(-1)) of chlorpyrifos. Both application rates caused a strong inhibition of carboxylesterase (62-78% of controls), acid phosphatase (56-60%) and beta-glucosidase (43-58%) activities. Soil microbial activity was also reduced in pesticide-sprayed soils as indicated by the decreased dehydrogenase (47%) and catalase (38%) activities compared with control soils. However, only carboxylesterase activity showed a dose-dependent response with the chlorpyrifos application rate. An in vitro trial was further performed to provide evidence of a direct interaction between the enzyme (carboxylesterase, acid phosphatase and beta-glucosidase) and the pesticide (chlorpyrifos and its main metabolites chlorpyrifos-oxon and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol). Results of these in vitro assays showed that the activity of carboxylesterase was directly affected by chlorpyrifos-oxon and, at less extend, by chlorpyrifos, whereas variations of both acid phosphatase and beta-glucosidase activities were likely dependent on changes in microbial activity. Urease and protease activities did not change in pesticide-treated soils compared with pesticide-free soils. Despite the absence of response in these two N-cycling enzyme activities, four enzymatic indexes (geometric mean, weighted mean, "treated-soil quality index" [T-SQI] and "integrated biological response" [IBRv2] index) were significantly lower in the chlorpyrifos-sprayed soils compared with controls. Moreover, there was a significant (r(2) = 0.87, P<0.0001) correlation between T-SQI and IBRv2 scores, which suggested that the IBRv2 index (an index used for assessing animal's health inhabiting contaminated sites) may be a complementary index in soil quality assessment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanchez-Hernandez, Juan C. | Hombre |
Univ Castilla La Mancha - España
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha - España |
| 2 | Sandoval, Marco | Hombre |
Universidad de Concepción - Chile
|
| 3 | Pierart, Antoine | Hombre |
Univ Toulouse - Francia
CNRS UMR 5245 - Francia Université de Toulouse - Francia Laboratoire Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement - Francia Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Francia |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad |
| Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad |
| Ministerio de EconomÃa y Competitividad |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This study was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (projects no. CTM2011-25788/TECNO and CTM2014-53915-R). Authors thank to Cristian Alejandro Lopez Padilla for his help in pesticide application and soil sampling, and three reviewers for excellent comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. |
| This study was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (projects no. CTM2011-25788/TECNO and CTM2014-53915-R ). Authors thank to Cristian Alejandro López Padilla for his help in pesticide application and soil sampling, and three reviewers for excellent comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. |