Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Best practices for assessing forage fish fisheries-seabird resource competition
Indexado
WoS WOS:000407410600024
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85021371371
DOI 10.1016/J.FISHRES.2017.05.018
Año 2017
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Worldwide, in recent years capture fisheries targeting lower-trophic level forage fish and euphausiid crustaceans have been substantial (similar to 20 million metric tons [MT] annually). Landings of forage species are projected to increase in the future, and this harvest may affect marine ecosystems and predator-prey interactions by removal or redistribution of biomass central to pelagic food webs. In particular, fisheries targeting forage fish and euphausiids may be in competition with seabirds, likely the most sensitive of marine vertebrates given limitations in their foraging abilities (ambit and gape size) and high metabolic rate, for food resources. Lately, apparent competition between fisheries and seabirds has led to numerous high-profile conflicts over interpretations, as well as the approaches that could and should be used to assess the magnitude and consequences of fisheries sea-bird resource competition. In this paper, we review the methods used to date to study fisheries competition with seabirds, and present "best practices" for future resource competition assessments. Documenting current fisheries competition with seabirds generally involves addressing two major issues: 1) are fisheries causing localized prey depletion that is sufficient to affect the birds? (i.e., are fisheries limiting food resources?), and 2) how are fisheries-induced changes to forage stocks affecting seabird populations given the associated functional or numerical response relationships? Previous studies have been hampered by mismatches in the scale of fisheries, fish, and seabird data, and a lack of causal understanding due to confounding by climatic and other ecosystem factors (e.g., removal of predatory fish). Best practices for fisheries-seabird competition research should include i) clear articulation of hypotheses, ii) data collection (or summation) of fisheries, fish, and seabirds on matched spatio-temporal scales, and integration of observational and experimental (including numerical simulation) approaches to establish connections and causality between fisheries and seabirds. As no single technique can provide all the answers to this vexing issue, an integrated approach is most promising to obtain robust scientific results and in turn the sustainability of forage fish fisheries from an ecosystem perspective.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Fisheries Research 0165-7836

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Fisheries
Scopus
Aquatic Science
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Sydeman, William J. Hombre Farallon Inst - Estados Unidos
Farallon Institute - Estados Unidos
2 Thompson, Sarah Ann Mujer Farallon Inst - Estados Unidos
UNIV WASHINGTON - Estados Unidos
Farallon Institute - Estados Unidos
University of Washington, Seattle - Estados Unidos
University of Washington - Estados Unidos
3 Anker-Nilssen, Tycho Hombre Norwegian Inst Nat Res - Noruega
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research - Noruega
4 Arimitsu, Mayumi Mujer US GEOL SURVEY - Estados Unidos
United States Geological Survey - Estados Unidos
5 Bennison, Ashley Mujer Univ Coll Cork - Irlanda
University College Cork - Irlanda
6 Bertrand, Sophie Mujer UMR MARBEC - Francia
MARBEC MARine Biodiversity, Exploitation and Conservation - Francia
7 Boersch-Supan, Philipp Hombre UNIV FLORIDA - Estados Unidos
University of Florida - Estados Unidos
8 Boyd, Charlotte Mujer UNIV WASHINGTON - Estados Unidos
University of Washington, Seattle - Estados Unidos
University of Washington - Estados Unidos
9 Bransome, Nicole C. Mujer Pew Charitable Trusts - Estados Unidos
The Pew Charitable Trusts - Estados Unidos
10 Crawford, Robert J. M. Hombre South African Dept Environm Affairs - República de Sudáfrica
UNIV CAPE TOWN - República de Sudáfrica
South African Institute of International Affairs - República de Sudáfrica
University of Cape Town - República de Sudáfrica
11 Daunt, Francis Hombre Ctr Ecol & Hydrol - Reino Unido
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Reino Unido
12 Furness, Robert W. Hombre Univ Glasgow - Reino Unido
MacArthur Green - Reino Unido
University of Glasgow - Reino Unido
13 Gianuca, Dimas Hombre Univ Exeter - Reino Unido
University of Exeter - Reino Unido
14 Gladics, Amanda Mujer Oregon State Univ Extens Serv - Estados Unidos
OSU Extension Service - Estados Unidos
15 Koehn, Laura Mujer UNIV WASHINGTON - Estados Unidos
University of Washington, Seattle - Estados Unidos
University of Washington - Estados Unidos
16 Lang, Jennifer W. Mujer UNIV WASHINGTON - Estados Unidos
University of Washington, Seattle - Estados Unidos
University of Washington - Estados Unidos
17 Logerwell, Elizabeth Mujer NOAA Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr - Estados Unidos
NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center - Estados Unidos
18 Morris, Taryn L. Mujer BirdLife South Africa - República de Sudáfrica
Seabird Conservation Programme - República de Sudáfrica
19 Phillips, Elizabeth M. Mujer UNIV WASHINGTON - Estados Unidos
University of Washington, Seattle - Estados Unidos
University of Washington - Estados Unidos
20 Provencher, Jennifer Mujer Acad Univ - Canadá
Acadia University - Canadá
21 Punt, Andre E. Hombre UNIV WASHINGTON - Estados Unidos
University of Washington, Seattle - Estados Unidos
University of Washington - Estados Unidos
22 Saraux, Claire Mujer IFREMER - Francia
MARBEC MARine Biodiversity, Exploitation and Conservation - Francia
23 Shannon, Lynne Mujer UNIV CAPE TOWN - República de Sudáfrica
University of Cape Town - República de Sudáfrica
24 Sherley, Richard B. Hombre Univ Exeter - Reino Unido
University of Exeter - Reino Unido
25 Simeone, Alejandro Hombre Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello - Chile
26 Wanless, Ross M. Hombre UNIV CAPE TOWN - República de Sudáfrica
Seabird Conservation Programme - República de Sudáfrica
University of Cape Town - República de Sudáfrica
27 Wanless, Sarah Mujer Ctr Ecol & Hydrol - Reino Unido
BirdLife South Africa - República de Sudáfrica
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Reino Unido
28 Zador, Stephani G. - NOAA Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr - Estados Unidos
NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center - Estados Unidos

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
National Research Foundation
National Research Foundation of Korea
Pew Charitable Trusts
South Africa's National Research Foundation

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
To review past approaches and develop guidelines and best practices to document ongoing seabird-fisheries competition for inclusion in modern-day ecosystem approach to fisheries, we held two multidisciplinary workshops (31 October 2015 in Cape Town, South Africa, and 19 January 2016 in Seattle, Washington, see http://www.faralloninstitute.org/seabirdfisheries-competition), convened specifically to address this issue. Each workshop was designed to bring together experts as well as early-career scientists in the fields of seabird ecology, fisheries science, and oceanography. This demographic breadth meant that institutional memory on the subject contributed to capacity building in this subject area. Funding for workshops and development of this manuscript was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts. We are grateful to South Africa's Department of Environmental Affairs for hosting the Cape Town workshop. RJMC is grateful to South Africa's National Research Foundation for funding support. We sincerely thank the reviewers and editors of Fisheries Research for providing constructive comments on the manuscript.
To review past approaches and develop guidelines and best practices to document ongoing seabird-fisheries competition for inclusion in modern-day ecosystem approach to fisheries, we held two multidisciplinary workshops (31 October 2015 in Cape Town, South Africa, and 19 January 2016 in Seattle, Washington, see http://www.faralloninstitute.org/seabirdfisheries-competition), convened specifically to address this issue. Each workshop was designed to bring together experts as well as early-career scientists in the fields of seabird ecology, fisheries science, and oceanography. This demographic breadth meant that institutional memory on the subject contributed to capacity building in this subject area. Funding for workshops and development of this manuscript was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts. We are grateful to South Africa's Department of Environmental Affairs for hosting the Cape Town workshop. RJMC is grateful to South Africa's National Research Foundation for funding support. We sincerely thank the reviewers and editors of Fisheries Research for providing constructive comments on the manuscript.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.