Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES FROM VIEW POINTS OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION IN TURKEY, ROMAN CATHOLICISM AND ORTHODOX JUDAISM
Indexado
WoS WOS:000423528900013
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85033380972
SciELO S1726-569X2017000200327
DOI
Año 2017
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



The arguments set forth by religious authority are important since it play a crucial role in shaping the social values of the public and influence the decision of individuals in the practice pertaining to bioethical issues. The Religious Affairs Administration (RAA) was established at the inception of the Republic of Turkey in 1924 to guide religious considerations moving out of the Ottoman caliphate to a secular bioethical framework. In this article, the bioethical views of the RAA under Islamic tradition is examined and contrasted with those influenced by the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Judaic traditions. On bioethical deliberations related to the beginning and end-of-life, all three religious traditions justify sacredness of life and that of God's will in preservation it. Assisted reproduction techniques between spouses is considered to be appropriate, although third party involvement is explicitly forbidden. Organ transplantation is approved by all three religious traditions, except uterine transplantation. The contraceptive practices are approved under certain conditions - the views differ most on approaches to contraception and the appropriateness of methods. The RAA has judgement on cloning is to prohibit it, like Roman Catholicism and Orthodox Judaism. In other topics, cosmetic surgery and gender determination are approved only for treatment.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Acta Bioethica 1726-569X

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Ethics
Medical Ethics
Social Sciences, Biomedical
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Applied Social Sciences
Biological Sciences
Health Sciences

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Guvercin, Cemal Huseyin Hombre Dokuz Eylul Univ - Turquía
Harvard Med Sch - Estados Unidos
Dokuz Eylul University - Turquía
Harvard Medical School - Estados Unidos
Children's Hospital Boston - Estados Unidos
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi - Turquía
2 Munir, Kerim M. Hombre Harvard Med Sch - Estados Unidos
Harvard Medical School - Estados Unidos
Children's Hospital Boston - Estados Unidos

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Fogarty International Center
National Institutes of Health
Harvard Medical School
Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health sponsored International Bioethics Research Education at the Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston Children’s Hospital
International Bioethics Research Education

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
The section on the opinions of the Religious Affairs Administration was read at the 3rd International Islam and Bioethics Symposium, 14 - 16 April 2010, Antalya, Turkey. The present work was supported, in part, by the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health sponsored International Bioethics Research Education grant (5R25TW009248) at the Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
The section on the opinions of the Religious Affairs Administration was read at the 3rd International Islam and Bioethics Symposium, 14 -16 April 2010, Antalya, Turkey. The present work was supported, in part, by the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health sponsored International Bioethics Research Education grant (5R25TW009248) at the Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.