Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report for cycles conducted in 2017–2018
Indexado
WoS WOS:001467878900001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:105007184528
DOI 10.1093/HUMREP/DEAF049
Año 2025
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



STUDY QUESTION What were the rates of utilization, effectiveness, and safety for assisted reproductive technology (ART) throughout the world in 2017 and 2018, and what trends were observed?SUMMARY ANSWER The total reported number of ART fresh and frozen cycles conducted in 83 participating countries was 2 913 498 in 2017 and 3 303 505 in 2018, with 5-year trends including an increasing proportion of cycles utilizing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and an increasing number of cycles utilizing pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT).WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Prior reports from the International Committee Monitoring ART (ICMART) have reported on the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of ART from participating countries, with an increase in the number of cycles and number of participating countries over time. These reports have described regional differences in the utilization of ART overall, as well as differences in the utilization of specific practices such as ICSI, PGT and single embryo transfer. Past reports demonstrated that rates of delivery per cycle have increased and rates of multiple gestations have decreased over time.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective, cross-sectional survey describes ART procedures performed globally in 2017 and 2018. Data were submitted to ICMART by participating countries from national or regional registries.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS There were 83 countries which provided data for cycles performed in 2017 or 2018, with the majority of countries providing data for both years. Aggregate data are reported for each participating country and analysed using methods developed by ICMART to calculate measures of utilization, effectiveness, and safety.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018. After imputing data for non-reporting centres in reporting countries, the estimated number of cycles performed in 2017 was 3 107 188 resulting in an estimated 814 588 babies. For 2018, the estimated number of cycles was 3 568 635 resulting in an estimated 870 814 babies. Utilization of ICSI for autologous fresh non-PGT cycles declined slightly compared with 2014 (54.6% in 2017 and 57.3% in 2018 compared with 64.8% in 2014). The percentage of transfers which were of frozen embryos was 55.7 % in 2017 and 57.9% in 2018, up from 38.9% in 2014. Among all countries, including those which reported no 'freeze all' cycles, the percentage of 'freeze all' cycles was 30.5% in 2017 and 32.7% in 2018, up from 13.1% in 2014. In countries reporting at least one retrieval cycle in which all embryos were frozen, the percentage of retrievals with no fresh embryo transfer increased (36.2% in 2017 and 36.8% in 2018, up from 20.1% in 2014). The number of PGT cycles in 2018 (172 247) was nearly 5-fold higher than the number reported in 2014 (36 512) with wide regional variation in utilization of PGT observed. In 2017, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.5% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 36.4% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.8% per autologous fresh transfer, 32.5% per autologous frozen transfer, and 47.3% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 33.1% (combined fresh transfer and frozen transfers). In 2018, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Human Reproduction 0268-1161

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Reproductive Biology
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Baker, Valerie L. - Johns Hopkins Univ - Estados Unidos
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Estados Unidos
2 Dyer, Silke Mujer UNIV CAPE TOWN - República de Sudáfrica
Groote Schuur Hospital - República de Sudáfrica
3 Adamson, G. David Mujer Univ New South Wales - Australia
UNSW Medicine - Australia
Equal3 Fertil - Estados Unidos
Stanford Univ - Estados Unidos
UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO - Estados Unidos
Stanford University School of Medicine - Estados Unidos
UCSF School of Medicine - Estados Unidos
4 Keller, Elena - Univ New South Wales - Australia
THEMA Consulting Pty Ltd - Australia
UNSW Medicine - Australia
5 Banker, Manish - Banker IVF & Womens Hosp - India
6 de Mouzon, Jacques Hombre Epidemiol Res & Dev - Francia
Epidemiology - Francia
7 Elgindy, Eman - Zagazig Univ - Egipto
Rahem Fertil Ctr - Egipto
Zagazig University - Egipto
8 Bai, Fu M. - Natl Ctr Women & Childrens Hlth - China
CDC - China
9 Ishihara, Osamu - Kagawa Nutr Univ - Japón
Kagawa Nutrition University - Japón
10 Jwa, Seung Chik - Jichi Med Univ - Japón
Jichi Medical University - Japón
11 Kupka, Markus Hombre Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen - Alemania
Gynaekologicum - Alemania
Klinikum der Universität München - Alemania
Reproductive Medicine Center – Gynaekologicum - Alemania
12 Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
Clínica Las Condes - Chile
13 Adamson, G. David Mujer Univ New South Wales - Australia
UNSW Medicine - Australia
Equal3 Fertil - Estados Unidos
Stanford Univ - Estados Unidos
UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO - Estados Unidos
Stanford University School of Medicine - Estados Unidos
UCSF School of Medicine - Estados Unidos

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Abbott
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation
Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Red Latinoamericana de Reproduccion Asistida
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction
Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand
Abbott Pharmaceuticals

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
CMART received unrestricted grants from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. ICMART also received financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproduccion Asistida; and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. ICMART appreciates the efforts of each of the participating countries and centres which provided data
ICMART received unrestricted grants from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. ICMART also received financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproducci\u00F3n Asistida; and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. ICMART appreciates the efforts of each of the participating countries and centres which provided data.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.