Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1007/S12551-025-01313-X | ||||
| Año | 2025 | ||||
| Tipo | revisión |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
About one-third of the proteins synthesized in eukaryotic cells are directed to the secretory pathway, where close to 70% are being N-glycosylated. N-glycosylation is a crucial modification for various cellular processes, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) glycoprotein folding quality control, lysosome delivery, and cell signaling. The defects in N-glycosylation can lead to severe developmental diseases. For the proteins to be glycosylated, they must be translocated to the ER through the Sec61 translocon channel, either via co-translationally or post-translationally. N-glycosylation not only could accelerate post-translational translocation but may also enhance protein stability, while protein folding can assist in their movement into the ER. However, the precise mechanisms by which N-glycosylation and folding influence translocation remain poorly understood. The chaperone BiP is essential for post-translational translocation, using a "ratchet" mechanism to facilitate protein entry into the ER. Although research has explored how BiP interacts with protein substrates, there has been less focus on its binding to glycosylated substrates. Here, we review the effect of N-glycosylation on protein translocation, employing single-molecule studies and ensembles approaches to clarify the roles of BiP and N-glycosylation in these processes. Our review explores the possibility of a direct relationship between translocation and a ratchet effect of glycosylation and the importance of BiP in binding glycosylated proteins for the ER quality control system.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson, Christian A. M. | - |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 2 | Alfaro-Valdes, Hilda M. | - |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Valparaíso - Chile |
| 3 | Kaplan, Merve | - |
UNIV OXFORD - Reino Unido
University of Oxford - Reino Unido |
| 4 | D'Alessio, Cecilia | - |
UNIV BUENOS AIRES - Argentina
Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn CONICET - Argentina Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (IIB3) - Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Argentina |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Universidad de Chile |
| Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET, Argentina) |
| Vicerrectoria de Investigacion y Desarrollo (VID) of Universidad de Chile |
| Fondo Apoyo Pago de Publicaciones Cientificas de la DIDITT-FaCiQyF |
| FIB-UV of Universidad de Valparaiso |
| ANID doctoral tesis grant |
| FaCiQyF |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This work was supported by Vicerrectoria de Investigacion y Desarrollo (VID) of Universidad de Chile ENL 10/22 and Fondo Apoyo Pago de Publicaciones Cientificas de la DI&DITT-FaCiQyF (C.A.M.W.), FIB-UV of Universidad de Valparaiso and ANID doctoral tesis grant (21221149) (H.M.A), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET, Argentina). |
| This work was supported by Vicerrector\u00EDa de Investigaci\u00F3n y Desarrollo (VID) of Universidad de Chile ENL 10/22 and Fondo Apoyo Pago de Publicaciones Cient\u00EDficas de la DI&DITT-FaCiQyF (C.A.M.W.), FIB-UV of Universidad de Valpara\u00EDso and ANID doctoral tesis grant (21221149) (H.M.A), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient\u00EDficas y T\u00E9cnicas (CONICET, Argentina). |