Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||
| DOI | 10.1007/S11356-025-36086-Z | ||
| Año | 2025 | ||
| Tipo |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
People facing pollution do not always have the resources needed to investigate their environment for harmful contaminants. In this paper, we report on a low-cost, accessible method to screen soil for inorganic arsenic, a substance associated with a growing list of acute and chronic diseases. The method adapts a commercial water test kit, which measures inorganic arsenic between 0 and 500 µg L−1 on a quantitative, discrete color scale. We evaluated two extraction solutions in determining bioaccessible and total inorganic arsenic. We characterized soil samples and standards containing total arsenic between 0.8 and 3240 mg kg−1 (n = 151) with the screening methodology and established laboratory methods. While the total screening method requires additional investigation, we propose the bioaccessible screening method for two purposes. First, it estimates in vitro bioaccessible assay (IVBA) arsenic (y=0.0972x, R2=0.576) to provide physiological insight. Second, it estimates a predicted minimum amount of total arsenic to compare to regulatory soil levels. Screening measurements above 82.5 and 132.0 µg L−1 are predicted to exceed the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (AZDEQ) and New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC) regulatory soil levels: 10 and 16 mg kg−1, respectively. False positives are almost entirely avoided, while the occurrence of false negatives increases approaching the predicted thresholds. Screening measurements in the ranges [0, 10), [10, 25), and [25, threshold] µg L−1 were false negatives (false omission rate) 0, 18.8, and 81.4% (AZDEQ) and 0, 8.7, and 68.5% (NYDEC) of the time, respectively. Our analysis supports screening total arsenic to at least as low as 8.5 mg kg−1.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walls, Dan | - |
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - Estados Unidos
The University of Arizona - Estados Unidos Bureau of Laboratory Services - Estados Unidos |
| 2 | Rodríguez-Oroz, Delia | - |
Universidad del Desarrollo - Chile
|
| 3 | Root, Robert A. | - |
The University of Arizona - Estados Unidos
|
| 4 | Chukwuonye, God’sgift N. | - |
The University of Arizona - Estados Unidos
|
| 5 | Alqattan, Zain Alabdain | - |
The University of Arizona - Estados Unidos
|
| 6 | Kinchy, Abby | - |
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - Estados Unidos
|
| 7 | Ureta, Sebastián | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Solar Energy Research Center (SERC) - Chile Centro de Investigación en Energía Solar - Chile |
| 8 | Engel-Di Mauro, Salvatore | - |
SUNY New Paltz - Estados Unidos
|
| 9 | Ramírez-Andreotta, Mónica D. | - |
The University of Arizona - Estados Unidos
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| National Science Foundation |
| Universidad del Desarrollo |
| National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. #1612554 and #1922257, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant No. #P42ES04940, the Technology Research Initiative Fund of the Center for Environmentally Sustainable Mining at the University of Arizona, and the Technologies Research Center for Society of the Faculty of Engineering at the Universidad del Desarrollo (C\u2009+). |