Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Loss and Downtime Assessment of RC Dual Wall–Frame Office Buildings Toward Resilient Seismic Performance
Indexado
WoS WOS:001419432000001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85217780589
DOI 10.3390/SU17031200
Año 2025
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



This study quantitatively assesses the impact of seismic design strategies on the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) dual wall-frame office buildings by comparing direct and indirect economic losses and downtime in life-cycle terms. A high-rise archetype building located in Santiago, Chile, on stiff soil was evaluated as a benchmark case study. Three design strategies to potentially enhance the seismic performance of a building designed conventionally were explored: (i) incorporating fluid viscous dampers (FVDs) in the lateral load-resisting structure; (ii) replacing conventional non-structural components with enhanced ones (ENCs); and (iii) a combination of the previous two strategies. First, probabilistic structural responses were estimated through incremental dynamic analyses using three-dimensional nonlinear models of the archetypes subjected to a set of hazard-consistent Chilean ground motions. Second, FEMA P-58 time-based assessment was conducted to estimate expected annual losses (EALs) for economic loss estimation. Finally, for downtime assessment, a novel probabilistic framework, built on the FEMA P-58 methodology and the REDi guidelines, was employed to estimate the expected annual downtimes (EADs) to achieve specific target recovery states, such as reoccupancy (RO) and functional recovery (FR). Results revealed that seismically enhancing RC dual wall-frame buildings with FVDs significantly improves resilience by reducing loss and downtime. For example, the enhanced building with FVDs achieved an EAL of 0.093% and EAL of 8.6 days for FR, compared to the archetype base building without design improvements, which exhibited an EAL of 0.125% and an EAD of 9.5 days for FR. In contrast, the impact of ENCs alone was minor, compared to the effect of FVDs, with an EAL of 0.106% and an EAD of 9.1 days for FR. With this detailed recovery modeling, probabilistic methods, and a focus on intermediate recovery states, this framework represents a significant advancement in resilience-based seismic design and recovery planning.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Sustainability 2071-1050

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Gallegos, Marco F. - Universidad del Bío Bío - Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
2 Araya‐letelier, Gerardo Hombre Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
3 Lopez-Garcia, Diego - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Centro de Investigación para la Gestión Integrada del Riesgo de Desastres (CIGIDEN) - Chile
4 Molina Hutt, Carlos - UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA - Canadá
The University of British Columbia - Canadá

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
ANID Fondecyt
Centro de Investigación para la Gestión Integrada del Riesgo de Desastres
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ANID FONDAP
ANID FONDECYT de Iniciacion
Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CIGIDEN) ANID FONDAP
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) de Chile
ANID Doctorado Nacional 2018 Folio
UBB-FAPEI

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
This research was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) de Chile, ANID Doctorado Nacional 2018 Folio 21181157, ANID FONDECYT de Iniciacion, Grant 11191194, Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CIGIDEN) ANID FONDAP 1523A0009, and UBB-FAPEI FP2460533.
Valuable comments on the Chilean seismic design practice were provided by Ian Watt (VMB Structural Engineering) and Mario Lafontaine (Rene Lagos Engineers). The strong motion database was provided by the SIBER-RISK project: Simulation Based Earthquake Risk and Resilience of Interdependent Systems and Networks. Funding for the APC was provided by ANID FONDECYT de Iniciaci\u00F3n, Grant 11191194. This support is greatly appreciated.
Valuable comments on the Chilean seismic design practice were provided by Ian Watt (VMB Structural Engineering) and Mario Lafontaine (Rene Lagos Engineers). The strong motion database was provided by the SIBER-RISK project: Simulation Based Earthquake Risk and Resilience of Interdependent Systems and Networks. Funding for the APC was provided by ANID FONDECYT de Iniciaci\u00F3n, Grant 11191194. This support is greatly appreciated.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.