Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.APPET.2025.107859 | ||||
| Año | 2025 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Unhealthy diets (rich in calories, sugar, fat, and sodium) are a major cause of obesity. Why individuals struggle to make healthy food choices remains unclear. This study examined how body mass index, biological sex, and eating context influence food attribute perception, the food choice process, and the percentage of healthy food choices. In an online study, males and females with and without obesity (n = 910) rated food images for healthiness and tastiness and made food choices after prompts directing them to choose foods they considered healthy (healthy prompt) or to choose as they would in their daily lives (typical prompt), which aimed to model healthy and typical eating contexts. When foods were classified as healthy or unhealthy using nutritional labeling information, all participants rated healthy foods with larger healthiness ratings, but females rated healthy foods as healthier and tastier than males. Still, participants with obesity had fewer healthy choices (i.e., choosing the food with the largest healthiness rating) regardless of sex and prompt. Further, tastiness differences were more relevant than healthiness differences during healthy food choices among participants with obesity, and more so after the typical prompt. On the contrary, healthiness differences were more relevant among participants with healthy weight regardless of prompt type. Our findings highlight the importance of eating contexts in how individuals use their perception of food attributes during healthy food choices and suggest that increasing the presence of healthy prompts and perceived tastiness of healthy foods may promote healthy food choices among individuals with obesity.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Larenas, G. | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 1 | G, Larenas | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 2 | Luarte, L. | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 2 | L, Luarte | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 3 | Kerr, B. | - |
Universidad San Sebastián - Chile
|
| 3 | B, Kerr | - |
Universidad San Sebastián - Chile
|
| 4 | Ossandon, T. | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 4 | T, Ossandón | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 5 | Cortés, | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 5 | V, Cortés | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 6 | Baudrand, R. | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 6 | R, Baudrand | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 7 | Leighton, C. Perez | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 7 | Leighton C, Pérez | - |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| FONDECYT |
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| Anillo de Ciencia y Tecnologia |
| ANILLO de Ciencia y Tecnologia ANID |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This work was supported by FONDECYT Regular 1221146 (to V.C.) , FONDECYT Regular 1230905 (to B.K.) , FONDECYT Regular 1190419 (to R.B.) , FONDECYT Regular 1230383 (to T.O.) , FONDECYT Regular 1240616 (to C.P-L.) , and ANILLO de Ciencia y Tecnologia ANID ACT210039 (to C.P-L, B.K, V.C., and R.B.) . The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. |
| This work was supported by FONDECYT Regular 1221146 (to V.C.), FONDECYT Regular 1230905 (to B.K.), FONDECYT Regular 1190419 (to R.B.), FONDECYT Regular 1230383 (to T.O.), FONDECYT Regular 1240616 (to C.P-L.), and ANILLO de Ciencia y Tecnolog\u00EDa ANID ACT210039 (to C.P-L, B.K, V.C., and R.B.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. |