Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Cabozantinib, a New Standard of Care for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Bone Metastases? Subgroup Analysis of the METEOR Trial
Indexado
WoS WOS:000427171900007
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85043372978
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.7352
Año 2018
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



PurposeCabozantinib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and AXL, increased progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in the phase III METEOR trial. Because bone metastases are associated with increased morbidity in patients with RCC, bone-related outcomes were analyzed in METEOR.Patients and MethodsSix hundred fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 60 mg cabozantinib or 10 mg everolimus. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS, OS, and ORR were conducted in patients grouped by baseline bone metastases status per independent radiology committee (IRC). Additional end points included bone scan response per IRC, skeletal-related events, and changes in bone biomarkers.ResultsFor patients with bone metastases at baseline (cabozantinib [n = 77]; everolimus [n = 65]), median PFS was 7.4 months for cabozantinib versus 2.7 months for everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.51]). Median OS was also longer with cabozantinib (20.1 months v 12.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.84]), and ORR per IRC was higher (17% v 0%). The rate of skeletal-related events was 23% with cabozantinib and 29% with everolimus, and bone scan response per IRC was 20% versus 10%, respectively. PFS, OS, and ORR were also improved with cabozantinib in patients without bone metastases. Changes in bone biomarkers were greater with cabozantinib than with everolimus. The overall safety profiles of cabozantinib and everolimus in patients with bone metastases were consistent with those observed in patients without bone metastases.ConclusionCabozantinib treatment was associated with improved PFS, OS, and ORR when compared with everolimus treatment in patients with advanced RCC and bone metastases and represents a good treatment option for these patients. (C) 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Oncology
Scopus
Oncology
Cancer Research
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Escudier, B. Hombre Inst Gustave Roussy - Francia
Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy - Francia
2 Powles, Thomas Hombre Queen Mary Univ London - Reino Unido
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry - Reino Unido
3 Motzer, Robert J. Hombre Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr - Estados Unidos
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center - Estados Unidos
4 Olencki, T. Hombre OHIO STATE UNIV - Estados Unidos
The Ohio State University - Estados Unidos
5 AREN-FRONTERA, OSVALDO RUDY Hombre Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos - Chile
Ctr Int Estudios Clin - Chile
6 Oudard, Stephan Hombre Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou - Francia
Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou - Francia
7 Rolland, F. Hombre Ctr Rene Gauducheau Ctr Lutte Canc Nantes - Francia
CLCC Nantes Atlantique Centre René Gauducheau - Francia
8 Tomczak, Piotr Hombre Uniwersytetu Med - Polonia
Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Panskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego - Polonia
9 Castellano, D. Hombre Hosp Univ 12 Octubre - España
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre - España
10 Appleman, Leonard J. Hombre Univ Pittsburgh - Estados Unidos
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Estados Unidos
11 Drabkin, Harry Hombre Med Univ South Carolina - Estados Unidos
Medical University of South Carolina - Estados Unidos
12 Vaena, Daniel Hombre Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin - Estados Unidos
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics - Estados Unidos
13 Milwee, S. Hombre Exelixis Inc - Estados Unidos
Exelixis Inc. - Estados Unidos
Exelixis, Inc. - Estados Unidos
14 Youkstetter, J. Mujer Exelixis Inc - Estados Unidos
Exelixis Inc. - Estados Unidos
Exelixis, Inc. - Estados Unidos
15 Lougheed, Julie C. Mujer Exelixis Inc - Estados Unidos
Exelixis Inc. - Estados Unidos
Exelixis, Inc. - Estados Unidos
16 Bracarda, Sergio Hombre Osped San Donato - Italia
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato - Italia
Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato - Italia
17 Choueiri, Toni K. Hombre Dana Farber Canc Inst - Estados Unidos
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Estados Unidos

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Exelixis
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
We thank the patients, their families, the investigators and site staff, and the study teams who participated in the METEOR trial. Patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were supported in part by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant P30 CA008748. Editorial support, which was funded by Exelixis, was provided by Fishawack Communications (Conshohocken, PA).
We thank the patients, their families, the investigators and site staff, and the study teams who participated in the METEOR trial. Patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were supported in part by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant P30 CA008748. Editorial support, which was funded by Exelixis, was provided by Fishawack Communications (Conshohocken, PA).

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.