Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.3389/FAGRO.2025.1534370 | ||||
| Año | 2025 | ||||
| Tipo | revisión |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Given the unpredictability, increasing frequency and severity of climatic events, it is crucial to determine the adaptation limits of agroecological strategies adopted by farmers in a range of environments. In times of drought many smallholders' farmers cope with stress using a series of crop diversification and soil management strategies. Intercropping and agroforestry systems complemented with mulching and copious organic matter applications can increase water storage, enhancing crops' water use efficiency. Although an overwhelming number of studies demonstrate that these agroecological designs and practices are associated with greater farm-level resilience, it is important to recognize the limits of resilience. The aim of this paper is to assess the limitations of agroecological practices in enhancing the ability of agroecosystems to adapt to climate change under extended drought stress which may overwhelm crops' adaptation response. A set of agroecological practices that can extend such limits under prolonged water stress scenarios are described. Two methodologies to assess farms' resilience to drought provide useful tools, as they can assist farmers and researchers in identifying the practices and underlying mechanisms that reduce vulnerability and enhance response capacity allowing certain farm systems to better resist and/or recover from droughts. Clearly, reducing farmers exposure to drought requires collective actions beyond the farm scale (i.e. restoring local watersheds to optimize local hydrological cycles) aspects not explored herein. When climatic events are compounded by uncertainties imposed by external economic and political conditions, farmers' abilities to overcome adversity may be reduced, emphasizing the importance of policy support, a dimension beyond the scope of this review.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Altieri, Miguel A. | - |
UNIV CALIF BERKELEY - Estados Unidos
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management - Estados Unidos |
| 2 | Nicholls, Clara I. | - |
UNIV CALIF BERKELEY - Estados Unidos
University of California, Berkeley - Estados Unidos |
| 3 | Montalba, Rene | - |
Universidad de La Frontera - Chile
|
| 4 | Vieli, Lorena | - |
Universidad de La Frontera - Chile
|
| 5 | Vazquez, Luis L. | - |
Ctr Latinoamer Invest Agroecol CELIA - Colombia
Centro Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Agroecologicas (CELIA) - Colombia |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Centro Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Agroecologicas (CELIA), Colombia |
| Centro Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Agroecologicas |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was partially funded by the Centro Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Agroecologicas (CELIA), Colombia. |
| The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was partially funded by the Centro Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Agroecologicas (CELIA), Colombia. |