Background:This study aimed to review the clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of osteochondral autograft transplantation applied to patellar cartilage lesions of patients under 18 years of age.Methods:Data from nine consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed for indications, preoperative complications, and clinical-radiographic outcomes. Patients were clinically evaluated using the Pedi-IKDC and Lysholm scores. In addition, return to sports and knee pain were assessed. MRI evaluation included an analysis of osteochondral graft integration using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue 2.0 score and radiographic classification of osteoarthritis using the Kellgren-Lawrence system.Results:Nine patients (9 knees, 6 males) with a mean age of 14 years (SD: 1.7, range; 11 to 17 y) were analyzed. Lesions were located on the medial facet (N=5), lateral facet (N=3), and central ridge of the patella (N=1). One or 2 cylindrical osteochondral grafts were transplanted, with a median diameter of 9 mm (range: 8 to 10 mm). The average lesion size was 102.9 mm2. At a mean follow-up of 45.1 months (range: 23 to 117 mo), the mean Pedi-IKDC score was 89.2 (SD: 9.8), and the Lysholm score was 94.4 (SD: 4.8). Patients returned to sports in an average of 7.3 months (SD: 2, range: 6 to 12 mo). MRI of 8 patients showed osteochondral graft integration with a mean magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue 2.0 score of 86.9 (SD: 7, range: 80 to 100). Six knees showed Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0 joint space on radiographs, and 3 showed grade 1. Eight patients were asymptomatic at the last follow-up, and 1 reported occasional mild pain with intense physical activity. One patient developed arthrofibrosis, requiring arthroscopic lysis of adhesions and manipulation.Conclusion:Osteochondral autograft transplantation is a safe and effective technique for treating symptomatic patellar full-thickness chondral lesions in adolescents. Long-term follow-up studies will determine whether the affected area maintains structural and functional integrity over time.Level of Evidence:Level IV-therapeutic study.