Dataciencia

Colección SciELO Chile

A comparative evaluation of PDQ-Evidence

Indexado

WoS	WOS:000427891500003
Scopus	SCOPUS_ID:85043781948

DOI

10.1186/S12961-018-0299-8

Año

2018

Tipo

artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras

Abstract

Conclusions: PDQ-Evidence is at least as efficient as other databases for finding health system evidence. However, using PDQ-Evidence is not intuitive for some people.

Revista

Revista	ISSN
Health Research Policy And Systems	1478-4505

Métricas Externas

PlumX	Altmetric	Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Plumx: https://plumanalytics.com/learn/about-metrics/
Altmetric: https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/
Dimensions: https://www.dimensions.ai/why-dimensions/

Disciplinas de Investigación

WOS
Health Policy & Services

Scopus
Health Policy

SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional

Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.

Autores - Afiliación

Ord.	Autor	Género	Institución - País
1	Johansen, Marit	Mujer	Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth - Noruega Norwegian Institute of Public Health - Noruega
2	RADA-GIACAMAN, GABRIEL	Hombre	Epistemonikos Fdn - Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile Epistemonikos Foundation - Chile
3	Rosenbaum, Sarah	Mujer	Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth - Noruega Norwegian Institute of Public Health - Noruega
4	Paulsen, Elizabeth	Mujer	Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth - Noruega Norwegian Institute of Public Health - Noruega
5	Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen	-	Stellenbosch Univ - República de Sudáfrica Natl Inst Communicable Dis - República de Sudáfrica Ctr Dev Best Practices Hlth - Camerún Stellenbosch University - República de Sudáfrica National Institute for Communicable Diseases - República de Sudáfrica Centre for the Development of Best Practices in Health - Camerún Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences - República de Sudáfrica
6	Opiyo, Newton	Hombre	Cochrane - Reino Unido Cochrane Editorial Unit - Reino Unido
7	SWiysonge, Charles	Hombre	Stellenbosch Univ - República de Sudáfrica South African Med Res Council - República de Sudáfrica UNIV CAPE TOWN - República de Sudáfrica Stellenbosch University - República de Sudáfrica South African Medical Research Council - República de Sudáfrica University of Cape Town - República de Sudáfrica Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences - República de Sudáfrica
8	Ding, Yunpeng	-	Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth - Noruega Norwegian Institute of Public Health - Noruega
9	Mukinda, Fidele K.	-	Univ Western Cape - República de Sudáfrica University of the Western Cape - República de Sudáfrica
10	Oxman, Andrew D.	Hombre	Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth - Noruega Norwegian Institute of Public Health - Noruega

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento

Fuente
Seventh Framework Programme
Sixth Framework Programme
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad)
Norwegian satellite of the Cochrane review group Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC)
European Commission's 7th Framework Programme through the SURE project
European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos

Agradecimiento
The search and identification of studies was partially funded by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme (Grant agreement no 222881) through the SURE project (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence for Policy in African Health Systems). Additional support has come from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) and the Norwegian satellite of the Cochrane review group Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).
The search and identification of studies was partially funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme (Grant agreement no 222881) through the SURE project (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence for Policy in African Health Systems). Additional support has come from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) and the Norwegian satellite of the Cochrane review group Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).

Agradecimiento

The search and identification of studies was partially funded by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme (Grant agreement no 222881) through the SURE project (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence for Policy in African Health Systems). Additional support has come from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) and the Norwegian satellite of the Cochrane review group Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).

The search and identification of studies was partially funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme (Grant agreement no 222881) through the SURE project (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence for Policy in African Health Systems). Additional support has come from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) and the Norwegian satellite of the Cochrane review group Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).