Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Dehydration tolerance rather than avoidance explains drought resistance in zoysiagrass
Indexado
WoS WOS:001368882300001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85209924758
DOI 10.1111/PPL.14622
Año 2024
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Irrigation of grasses dominates domestic water use across the globe, and better understanding of water use and drought resistance in grasses is of undeniable importance for water conservation. Breeding programs have released cultivars with improved drought resistance, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We sought to characterize the mechanisms driving drought resistance in four zoysiagrass cultivars (Lobo, Zeon, Empire, and Meyer) reported to exhibit contrasting levels of drought resistance. A dry-down was performed through deficit irrigation until 70% decline in evapotranspiration. All cultivars exhibited similar drought avoidance as they dehydrated similarly throughout the drought. Lobo and Zeon, however, exhibited a 70% decline in evapotranspiration two to three days after Empire and Meyer, thus experiencing lower water potentials. Regarding drought tolerance, Lobo and Zeon maintained higher normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and lower perceived canopy mortality at higher dehydration levels than Empire and Meyer. We use "perceived" because visual assessments of canopy mortality are influenced by drought-induced leaf rolling. During the recovery, leaves rehydrated and unrolled, so the "actual" canopy mortality could be evaluated. All cultivars exhibited similar mortality on the first recovery day despite Lobo and Zeon experiencing more severe dehydration. Throughout the recovery, Lobo and Empire exhibited faster re-growth and showed the lowest canopy mortality, and Lobo exhibited the highest NDVI. The improved drought resistance of Lobo and Zeon results from greater dehydration tolerance rather than avoidance. This study has implications for lawn owners selecting the best cultivars and for breeding programs aiming at improving drought resistance of zoysiagrasses.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Physiologia Plantarum 0031-9317

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Plant Sciences
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Simpson, Emma - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
2 Haverroth, Eduardo J. - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
3 Taggart, Matthew - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
4 Andrade, Moab T. - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
5 Villegas, Daniel A. - Comision Chilena de Energia Nuclear - Chile
6 Carbajal, Esdras M. - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
7 Oliveira, Leonardo A. - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
8 Suchoff, David - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
9 Milla-Lewis, Susana - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos
10 Cardoso, Amanda A. - North Carolina State Univ - Estados Unidos
NC State University - Estados Unidos

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
North Carolina State University
Center for Turfgrass Environmental Research and Education Board

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
This study was supported by the Center for Turfgrass Environmental Research and Education Board (NC State University, Raleigh, USA) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project 7003279 (AAC).r No Statement Available
This study was supported by the Center for Turfgrass Environmental Research and Education Board (NC State University, Raleigh, USA) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project 7003279 (AAC).

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.