Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2024.142765 | ||
| Año | 2024 | ||
| Tipo |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Copper can accumulate in agricultural topsoil through the use of Cu-based fungicides, which may harm soil organisms such as earthworms. This study aimed at reviewing the effects of copper on earthworms at different levels of biological organization, and to determine critical values of copper toxicity to earthworms using a meta-analysis and accounting for lethal and sub-lethal effects and different earthworm species and exposure conditions. Endpoints at the sub-individual level were more sensitive than at higher levels of organization. At the individual level, the most sensitive endpoints were reproduction and growth (hatching success, hatchling growth). Hormetic growth was clearly recognized at copper concentrations less than 80 mg kg−1 in dry soil. However, effects at the sub-individual level already occurred at lower concentrations. Considering all the exposure conditions, the calculated weighted means were 113 mg Cu kg−1 dry soil (95% CI -356; 582) for the LC50 (lethal concentration for 50% of the exposed individuals), 94.6 mg Cu kg−1 dry soil (95% CI 14.0; 175) for the EC50 reproduction, and 144 mg Cu kg−1 dry soil (95% CI -12.6; 301) for the EC50 growth or weight change. When accounting for the origin of the soil, earthworms were five times more sensitive to copper (LC50) in natural than in artificial soils. The different factors affecting Cu toxicity to earthworms explain the high variability of these values, making it difficult to derive thresholds. However, considering the potential negative effects of copper on earthworms, attention should be given to the more sustainable use of human-contributed copper in agricultural soils.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pelosi, C. | - |
Université d'Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse - Francia
|
| 2 | Gavinelli, F. | - |
Università degli Studi di Padova - Italia
|
| 3 | Petit-dit-Grezeriat, L. | - |
Université d'Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse - Francia
|
| 4 | Serbource, C. | - |
Université d'Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse - Francia
|
| 5 | Schoffer, J. T. | - |
Centro de Ecología Aplicada y Sustentabilidad - Chile
Universidad de Las Américas, Chile - Chile |
| 6 | Ginocchio Cea, Rosanna | Mujer |
Centro de Ecología Aplicada y Sustentabilidad - Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile |
| 7 | YANEZ-PRIETO, CAROLINA | Mujer |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso - Chile
|
| 8 | Concheri, G. | - |
Università degli Studi di Padova - Italia
|
| 9 | Rault, M. | - |
Université d'Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse - Francia
|
| 10 | van Gestel, C. A.M. | - |
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Países Bajos
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior |
| Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo |
| ECOS Sud |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This study received financial support from ECOS Sud (project C21B03) and ANID (project ECOS210001) for Franco-Chilean collaborations. It was also supported by the FONDECYT project 3220026 and by the ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002 project (Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, CAPES). |