Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.ORALONCOLOGY.2024.107032 | ||
| Año | 2024 | ||
| Tipo |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Introduction: The aims of this study were to investigate the rate and time to return to work (RTW) after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and to explore the impact of disease or work-related factors leading to variations in RTW outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of disease, socioeconomic, work-related and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Qualitative analysis of responses for facilitators and barriers to RTW. Results: A total of 47 participants employed at diagnosis were included in the study, with an average age 56 years. Median survey time 3.2 years. 22 participants underwent TORS only with 25 undergoing TORS with adjuvant therapy. 93.6 % had stage 1 disease. 95.7 % of participants RTW after TORS with a mean time of 13.6 weeks. Patients returned earlier after TORS alone compared to those requiring adjuvant treatment (10 weeks vs. 17 weeks; p = 0.13) Overall high HR-QOL metrics for all patients, with those undergoing adjuvant having significantly poorer outcomes for the dry mouth/sticky saliva (9.1 vs 41.3, p=<0.001) items. Qualitative analysis of free text responses showed facilitators and barriers to RTW fell under four main categories: physical, phycological/emotional, financial and workplace. Conclusion: High rate of RTW amongst patients after TORS, which is the highest reported amongst head and neck cancer literature to date. Participants returned earlier after surgery only compared to adjuvant treatment, but both groups reported high HR-QOL metrics. Physical effects of treatment, including fatigue and oral dysfunction were some of the main barriers to RTW; whereas flexible working arrangements and support from employer/colleagues were major facilitators.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green, Lorne | - |
Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre - Australia
|
| 2 | McDowell, Lachlan | - |
Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre - Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Australia |
| 3 | Ip, Fiona | - |
Epworth Richmond Hospital - Australia
|
| 4 | Tapia, Mario | - |
Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre - Australia
Hospital Guillermo Grant Benavente - Chile |
| 5 | Zhou, Meiling | - |
Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre - Australia
|
| 6 | Fahey, Michael T. | - |
Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre - Australia
|
| 7 | Dixon, Benjamin | - |
Epworth Richmond Hospital - Australia
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne - Australia University of Melbourne - Australia |
| 8 | Magarey, Matthew | - |
Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre - Australia
Epworth Richmond Hospital - Australia University of Melbourne - Australia |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The authors would like to sincerely thank A/Prof Karla Gough from the Department of Oncology, PMCC, Melbourne, Australia, for her insight and guidance on the qualitative analysis process. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. |