Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1080/20008066.2024.2364443 | ||||
| Año | 2024 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Background: Despite its popularity, evidence of the effectiveness of Psychological First Aid (PFA) is scarce.Objective: To assess whether PFA, compared to psychoeducation (PsyEd), an attention placebo control, reduces PTSD and depressive symptoms three months post-intervention.Methods: In two emergency departments, 166 recent-trauma adult survivors were randomised to a single session of PFA (n = 78) (active listening, breathing retraining, categorisation of needs, assisted referral to social networks, and PsyEd) or stand-alone PsyEd (n = 88). PTSD and depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline (T0), one (T1), and three months post-intervention (T2) with the PTSD Checklist (PCL-C at T0 and PCL-S at T1/T2) and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Self-reported side effects, post-trauma increased alcohol/substance consumption and interpersonal conflicts, and use of psychotropics, psychotherapy, sick leave, and complementary/alternative medicine were also explored.Results: 86 participants (51.81% of those randomised) dropped out at T2. A significant proportion of participants in the PsyEd group also received PFA components (i.e. contamination). From T0 to T2, we did not find a significant advantage of PFA in reducing PTSD (p = .148) or depressive symptoms (p = .201). However, we found a significant dose-response effect between the number of delivered components, session duration, and PTSD symptom reduction. No significant difference in self-reported adverse effects was found. At T2, a smaller proportion of participants assigned to PFA reported increased consumption of alcohol/substances (OR = 0.09, p = .003), interpersonal conflicts (OR = 0.27, p = .014), and having used psychotropics (OR = 0.23, p = .013) or sick leave (OR = 0.11, p = .047).Conclusions: Three months post-intervention, we did not find evidence that PFA outperforms PsyEd in reducing PTSD or depressive symptoms. Contamination may have affected our results. PFA, nonetheless, appears to be promising in modifying some post-trauma behaviours. Further research is needed.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FIGUEROA-ESPINOZA, RODRIGO ADOLFO JOSE | Hombre |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Univ Amsterdam - Países Bajos Res Ctr Integrated Nat Disaster Management Cigide - Chile Universiteit van Amsterdam - Países Bajos Research Centre for Integrated Natural Disaster Management (Cigiden) - Chile |
| 2 | Cortes, Paula Francisca | - |
Res Ctr Integrated Nat Disaster Management Cigide - Chile
Research Centre for Integrated Natural Disaster Management (Cigiden) - Chile |
| 3 | Miller, Carolina | - |
Pontificia Univ Chile - Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile |
| 4 | Marín, Humberto | Hombre |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Res Ctr Integrated Nat Disaster Management Cigide - Chile Research Centre for Integrated Natural Disaster Management (Cigiden) - Chile |
| 5 | Gillibrand, Rodrigo | Hombre |
Hosp Trabajador - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago - Chile |
| 6 | Hoeboer, Chris M. | Hombre |
Univ Amsterdam - Países Bajos
Universiteit van Amsterdam - Países Bajos |
| 7 | Olff, Miranda | Mujer |
Univ Amsterdam - Países Bajos
ARQ Natl Psychotrauma Ctr - Países Bajos Universiteit van Amsterdam - Países Bajos ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre - Países Bajos |
| Fuente |
|---|
| SUSESO |
| Fundacion Cientifica y Tecnologica ACHS (FUCYT) through the Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovacion en Prevencion de Accidentes y Enfermedades Profesionales - Superintendencia de Seguridad Social (SUSESO), Chile |
| Fundación Científica y Tecnológica ACHS |
| Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación en Prevención de Accidentes y Enfermedades Profesionales–Superintendencia de Seguridad Social |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This work was funded by the Fundacion Cientifica y Tecnologica ACHS (FUCYT) through the Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovacion en Prevencion de Accidentes y Enfermedades Profesionales - Superintendencia de Seguridad Social (SUSESO), Chile. Neither FUCYT nor SUSESO was involved in this study's design, conduct, or analysis. |
| This work was funded by the Fundaci\u00F3n Cient\u00EDfica y Tecnol\u00F3gica ACHS (FUCYT) through the Proyectos de Investigaci\u00F3n e Innovaci\u00F3n en Prevenci\u00F3n de Accidentes y Enfermedades Profesionales\u2013Superintendencia de Seguridad Social (SUSESO), Chile. Neither FUCYT nor SUSESO was involved in this study\u2019s design, conduct, or analysis. To Hospital Dr. S\u00F3tero del R\u00EDo and Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago, where this study took place. |