Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.NEWIDEAPSYCH.2024.101096 | ||||
| Año | 2024 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Countless definitions of personality have been proposed throughout history. As a consequence, contemporary psychology lacks a definition that elicits broad consensus and avoids ambiguity. To overcome this difficulty it seems beneficial to draw on the field of philosophical anthropology, as an epistemologically prior and more general discipline. Understanding that a single manuscript cannot achieve consensus, an interdisciplinary contribution is proposed through a dialogue between two definitions of personality. On the one hand, that elaborated by the father of personality psychology, Gordon Allport, which is the best known and most cited of all. On the other hand, the one developed by Martin Echavarria, inspired by the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. From this interdisciplinary dialogue, a variant of Echavarria's definition and a brief definition of personality are proposed. It is expected that this contribution would not only help to the study of personality, but also to the interdisciplinary development of the discipline of psychology.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rojas Saffie, Juan Pablo | Hombre |
Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
|
| 2 | Garcia-Matte, Nicolas | - |
Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile Universidad de Chile - Chile |
| 3 | Silva-Beyer, Vicente | - |
Universidad de Los Andes, Chile - Chile
|
| 4 | Murugan, Bala | - |
Universidad de Los Andes, Chile - Chile
|
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| We thank Daniela Marbach for reviewing the text and providing excellent suggestions, especially regarding the language. We also thank Gonzalo Letelier for promptly guiding us through every philosophical doubt that arose during the work. Finally, we would like to thank the Association of Integral Psychology of the Person (APSIP) for supporting and encouraging us to carry out this work. |