Background: Rectal prolapse is a rare clinical entity, usually accompanied by other pelvic floor disorders, with a negative impact on quality of life. There are few models of quality of life adapted to our reality. One of them is the EQ-D5, adapted by Olivares-Tirado. Objectives: To evaluate the quality of life and functional outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery between 2015 and 2021 and correlate them with the different abdominal techniques. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional and cohort study. A total of 84 patients were screened, 59 were included. The EQ-D5 Survey was used for the analysis of quality of life. To complement the study, the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and the Constipation Scoring System were measured. Results: There were significant changes in all surveys applied to pre-and postoperative improvement, with no differences between surgical techniques, but with a lower rate of postoperative stay in the laparoscopic group. Discussion: There is an improvement in the postoperative quality of life that is reflected in the indices obtained, independent of the surgical technique, however, this is attenuated in recidivated patients, which is related to the literature, also without finding differences between the techniques. There is less postoperative constipation in the ventral rectopexy te-chnique. Conclusions: There is improvement in the quality of life independent of the surgical technique, without changes in relapsed patients. Perhaps the fastest and easiest technique for handling should be chosen, ideally laparoscopic.