Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.3390/SU16052134 | ||||
| Año | 2024 | ||||
| Tipo | revisión |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Due to its inherent characteristics, such as a light weight and ease of workability, timber is ideal for prefabricated and modular construction. However, since the research in this field covers a wide range of niches such as structural engineering, building physics, design for assembly and disassembly, and life cycle analysis, among others, and since there has been considerable development of the field in past years-boosted by new mass timber products and tall timber construction-it is difficult to critically analyze the current state of the art, current trends, and research challenges. Therefore, this research aimed to cover a systematic review of 409 articles to assess the field of prefabricated and modular timber construction critically. The methodology comprised a co-word network approach using the Science Mapping Analysis Software Tool (SciMAT, Version 3) to illustrate their evolution from 1990 to 2023. The findings show that the circular economy and digital technologies significantly impact the development of these technologies, which can potentially provide practical solutions for designing buildings with a circular approach and improving productivity and efficiency in the construction process. However, it is essential to acknowledge a notable deficiency in the research and understanding of these subjects. Therefore, various sectors must take the lead in conducting a thorough reassessment to enhance research and development in the field. Finally, the findings from this research can significantly contribute to existing knowledge and serve as a comprehensive platform for the further exploration of prefabricated and modular timber construction.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gutierrez, Nohelia | - |
Univ Coimbra - Portugal
Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia - Portugal |
| 2 | Negrao, Joao | - |
Univ Coimbra - Portugal
Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia - Portugal |
| 3 | Dias, Alfredo | - |
Univ Coimbra - Portugal
Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia - Portugal |
| 4 | Guindos Bretones, Pablo | Hombre |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Timber Innovation Center UC |
| European Social Fund Plus |
| European Social Fund through the Regional Operational Program for the Centre (Centro2020) of Portugal 2020 |
| Institute for Sustainabilityand Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE) |
| Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering |
| Regional Operational Program for the Centre |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This research was funded by CENTRO-08-5864-FSE-000031 with the title Forest for Future(F4F) project, financed through co-financing by the European Social Fund through the Regional Operational Program for the Centre (Centro2020) of Portugal 2020 and the Institute for Sustainabilityand Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE). In addition, the authors would like to recog-nize the financial support provided by the Timber Innovation Center UC, ANID BASAL FB210015 (CENAMAD) |
| This research was funded by CENTRO-08-5864-FSE-000031 with the title Forest for Future (F4F) project, financed through co-financing by the European Social Fund through the Regional Operational Program for the Centre (Centro2020) of Portugal2020 and the Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE). In addition, the authors would like to recognize the financial support provided by the Timber Innovation Center UC, ANID BASAL FB210015 (CENAMAD). |