Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Budget Impact Analysis of Olaparib in Combination with Bevacizumab for Maintenance Therapy for Ovarian Cancer in Argentina
Indexado
WoS WOS:001237782800001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85195205656
DOI 10.1007/S41669-024-00495-6
Año 2024
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Objectives To perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing olaparib as maintenance therapy in women who have BRCA mutations (BRCAm) with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) in combination with bevacizumab in Argentina.Methods A BIA model was used to analyse over a 5-year time horizon the change in the health system's budget following the adoption of olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCAm patients with PSROC. The BIA for each year was estimated by comparing the cost difference between the current scenario (treatment with bevacizumab) and the new scenario (the addition of olaparib) for a third-party payer. The BIA is estimated at the national health system level, and by healthcare sectors in Argentina (public sector, social security and private sector). International and national epidemiological data were used to determine the target patient population. Clinical efficacy, safety outcomes and duration of treatments were obtained from the pivotal clinical study report. Relevant direct medical costs were obtained from public data in Argentina and expert consultation. All the costs are reported in US dollars as of October 2022 ($1 = 152.59 Argentine pesos). A scenario analysis assessed the full coverage of the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) test in Argentina. In addition, one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the model robustness.Results For a third-party payer with a cohort of 1,000,000 women covered, the estimated target population was 2 individuals in year 1 and 6 individuals in year 5. The incorporation of olaparib, with a wholesale price per pack of $3176.32, was associated with a weighted average of the budget impact per member per month (PMPM) of $0.062 for the national health system, being above the estimated health system budget impact threshold ($0.0153). By healthcare sector, the results of budget impact PMPM for year 5 ranged between $0.08 (public sector) and $0.114 (private sector). For all perspectives, the variables that most influenced the budget impact was the incidence of ovarian cancer, the drug acquisition cost and the treatment duration.Conclusions The introduction of olaparib for the treatment of BRCAm women with PSROC has a high budget impact for all three health systems in Argentina.

Revista



Revista ISSN
2509-4262

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Economics
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Rojas-Roque, Carlos Hombre Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS - Argentina
Univ York - Reino Unido
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
University of York - Reino Unido
2 Silvestrini, Constanza - Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS - Argentina
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
3 Argento, Fernando - Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS - Argentina
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
4 Sugg, Daniela - Sugg & Asociados Consultancy - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello - Chile
Sugg y Asociados Consultancy - Chile
5 Augustovski, Federico Hombre Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS - Argentina
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
6 Coelli, Jesica - Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS - Argentina
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
7 Espinola, Natalia - Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS - Argentina
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
AstraZeneca

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
No Statement Available
This study was made possible by the support of AstraZeneca Argentina S.A. through an independent research grant. The sponsor of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the manuscript.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.