Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.AGSY.2024.103987 | ||||
| Año | 2024 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
CONTEXT: The Latin America-Caribbean (LAC) region has the potential to pursue a sustainable expansion of livestock production and capitalise on the growing global demand for dairy and beef products. However, it is necessary to understand the predominant production systems and their biophysical, economic, social, and environmental performances. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the milk production systems of nine countries of the region according to their major biophysical, socio-economic, and environmental performance indicators. METHODS: A panel of experts from different research organisations of each of the 9 countries defined the modal milk production system based on national reports and statistics. Each system was modelled by means of a wholefarm model, and 22 performance indicators were estimated as a result. The countries were classified in groups by cluster and principal component analyses and the sources of similarities and differences among them were described using the information provided by the 22 indicators evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A pattern comprising three groups of countries was found. Honduras, Nicaragua, Panam <acute accent>a, Paraguay, and Ecuador formed a group with the largest room for improvement in terms of productivity (milk and beef) and profit, associated with low yields and low quality of home-grown forage consumption and poor herd efficiency. However, they attained a competitive cost of production in global terms. The group of Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica achieved a higher production per hectare and larger scale of operations while also maintaining a competitive cost of production. Chile showed a unique suite of indicators, with even higher productivity and profit overall. Higher productivity and profit indicators were related to increased output and income per unit of workforce or family unit as well as to lower emissions of CH 4 per unit of product. Emissions per hectare naturally increased with productivity although below the levels of more intensified overseas countries where environmental regulations are applied. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this study determine pathways for regional or national technology transfer and innovation programs and public policies in LAC to boost milk production with a systems approach and consideration of economic, social and environmental impacts.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farina, Santiago | - |
Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIA - Uruguay
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria – INIA Uruguay - Uruguay Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP) - Ecuador |
| 2 | Moreno, Osiris Vigil | - |
Inst Innovac Agr Panam IDIAP - Panamá
Instituto de Innovación Agropecuaria de Panamá (IDIAP) - Panamá |
| 3 | Candioti, Francisco | - |
Slto Agro SS - Argentina
Salto Agro S.S. - Argentina |
| 4 | Villanueva, Cristobal | - |
Ctr Agronom Trop Invest & Ensenanza CATIE - Costa Rica
CATIE - Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza - Costa Rica |
| 5 | Ledezma, William Sanchez | - |
Inst Nacl Innovac & Transferencia Tecnol Agr INTA - Costa Rica
Instituto Nacional de Innovación y Transferencia en Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) - Costa Rica |
| 6 | Moscoso, Cristian J. | Hombre |
INIA Remehue - Chile
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - Chile |
| 7 | Cajarville, Cecilia | - |
Univ La Republ UdelaR - Uruguay
Universidad de la República - Uruguay |
| 8 | Charlon, Veron | - |
Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr INTA - Argentina
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA, Rafaela - Argentina Instituto Nicaragüense de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) - Argentina |
| 9 | Abaunza, Luis Urbina | - |
Inst Nicaraguense Tecnol Agr INTA - Nicaragua
Instituto Nicaragüense de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) - Nicaragua |
| 10 | Viter, Antonio Guacapin | - |
Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIAP - Ecuador
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria – INIA Uruguay - Uruguay Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP) - Ecuador |
| 11 | Chirife, Silvia | - |
Inst Paraguayo Tecnol Agr IPTA - Paraguay
Oficina Central - Paraguay |
| 12 | Herrera, Domiciano | - |
Inst Innovac Agr Panam IDIAP - Panamá
Instituto de Innovación Agropecuaria de Panamá (IDIAP) - Panamá |
| 13 | Stirling, Sofia | - |
Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIA - Uruguay
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria – INIA Uruguay - Uruguay Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP) - Ecuador |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| <STRONG>Funding</STRONG> This research was funded by FONTAGRO through the project " Sustainable Intensification of Dairy" with grant FTG/RF-15940-RG.The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The opinions in this publication are the exclusive responsibility of the authors, and they do not reflect the point of view of FONTAGRO, its Board of Directors, the Bank, their sponsoring in- stitutions, or the countries represented. |
| The modal dairy systems from nine countries of the LAC region were established by a panel of experts from different national research organisations: INIA and UdelaR Uruguay, INTA Argentina, INIAP Paraguay, INIA Chile, INIAP Ecuador, INTA and CATIE Costa Rica, IDIAP Panam\u00E1, DICTA Honduras, and INTA Nicaragua and Heifer Nicaragua (Table A1; Appendix). These organisations gathered voluntarily as part of a larger project funded by the FONTAGRO network ( Saini, 2023 ). The selection of experts from each country was carried out independently by each national organisation's authorities based on their academic education and expertise in dairy production systems and evidence of engagement with the productive sector. |