This commentary analyses one of the notions of the right to private life in numeral 4º of article 19 of the Political Constitution, used by the Court of Appeals of Santiago in a case of disclosure of personal data. Its relationship with some exponents of Chilean doctrine is discussed. This ruling resolves a case on disclosure of private data of the manager of a legal entity by a website dedicated to facilitating various ways to make claims. These data were available and accessible to interested parties. The particularity of the decision lies in the extension of the idea of privacy to cases of malicious overexposure of information referring to people who fulfil a certain function. This unusual and novel criterion in the way of understanding the scope of the right to private life requires the analysis of the case considering a systematization different from the ones mentioned. To do this, the categories proposed by Daniel Solove in his work Understanding Privacy, which appeared more than a decade ago in the national doctrine by Rodolfo Figueroa, are used as a way of obtaining a better understanding of cases such as the one discussed.