This paper analyses the Chilean case law on indirect profit in the action for disgorge-ment of profits, focusing on the restitution of the quantum of the profit. a dual classification is proposed: positive profit refers to the net gain, and negative profit to the saving of expenses. furthermore, a distinction is made between the broad quantum of profit, which includes the total restitution received, and the narrow quantum of profit, which only covers the difference between what was paid and received. Chilean case law suggests that both broad and restricted quantum have been compensated, considering factors such as the nature of the act or contract, the existence of tangible assets, the exercise of civil actions and the qualification of the third party. in some cases, the disgorgement of profits action has been used as a substitute or cover for the claim. The Inverlink case provides an opportu-nity to contrast these factors and their relationship to similar cases.