Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.119711 | ||||
| Año | 2024 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
The small ice-free areas of Antarctica are essential locations for both biodiversity and scientific research but are subject to considerable and expanding human impacts, resulting primarily from station-based research and support activities, and local tourism. Awareness by operators of the need to conserve natural values in and around station and visitor site footprints exists, but the cumulative nature of impacts often results in reactive rather than proactive management. With human activity spread across many isolated pockets of ice-free ground, the pathway to the greatest reduction of human impacts within this natural reserve is through better management of these areas, which are impacted the most. Using a case study of Australia's Casey Station, we found significant natural values persist within the immediate proximity (<10 m) of long-term station infrastructure, but encroachment by physical disturbance results in ongoing pressures. Active planning to better conserve such values would provide a direct opportunity to enhance protection of Antarctica's environment. Here we introduce an approach to systematic conservation planning, tailored to Antarctic research stations, to help managers improve the conservation of values surrounding their activity locations. Use of this approach provides a potential mechanism to balance the need for scientific access to the continent with international obligations to protect its environment. It may also facilitate the development of subordinate conservation tools, including management plans and natural capital accounting. By proactively minimising and containing their station footprints, national programs can also independently demonstrate their commitment to protecting Antarctica's environment.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brooks, Shaun T. | - |
CSIRO Environm - Australia
Univ Tasmania - Australia Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Australia Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - Australia |
| 2 | Jabour, Julia | - |
Univ Tasmania - Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - Australia |
| 3 | Hughes, Kevin A. | Hombre |
BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY - Reino Unido
|
| 4 | Morgan, Fraser | - |
Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res - Nueva Zelanda
UNIV AUCKLAND - Nueva Zelanda The University of Auckland - Nueva Zelanda Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research - Nueva Zelanda |
| 5 | Convey, Peter | Hombre |
BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY - Reino Unido
Univ Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica Centro Internacional Cabo de Hornos (CHIC) - Chile Millennium Inst Biodivers Antarctic & Subantarct E - Chile University of Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica Millennium Institute Biodiversity of Antarctic and Subantarctic Ecosystems (BASE) - Chile |
| 6 | Polymeropoulos, Elias T. | Hombre |
Univ Tasmania - Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - Australia |
| 7 | Bergstrom, Dana M. | Mujer |
UNIV WOLLONGONG - Australia
Univ Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica Australian Antarctic Div - Australia University of Wollongong - Australia University of Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica Australian Antarctic División - Australia |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research |
| Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship |
| NERC |
| Natural Environment Research Council |
| Biological Anthropology Section |
| Australian Antarctic Division, Australian Antarctic Science project |
| Te Punaha Matatini, a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence |
| Te Pūnaha Matatini |
| expert groups including the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research |
| Committee for Environmental Protection |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| S.T.B. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. This work was funded and supported by the Australian Antarctic Division, Australian Antarctic Science project 4565. P.C. and K.A.H. are supported by NERC core funding to the BAS 'Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation' Team and Environment Office, respectively. F.J.M is supported by Te Punaha Matatini, a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence. This article contributes to the 'Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation' (Ant-ICON) research programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) . We thank Anthony O'Grady, Ewan McIvor, Tessa Bird, James Fleming and Andy Sharman for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the 12 AAD staff that participated in the stakeholder workshops supporting this project. |
| S.T.B. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. This work was funded and supported by the Australian Antarctic Division , Australian Antarctic Science project 4565. P.C. and K.A.H. are supported by NERC core funding to the BAS ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team and Environment Office, respectively. F.J.M is supported by Te Pūnaha Matatini , a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence. This article contributes to the ‘Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation’ (Ant-ICON) research programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) . We thank Anthony O'Grady, Ewan McIvor, Tessa Bird, James Fleming and Andy Sharman for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the 12 AAD staff that participated in the stakeholder workshops supporting this project. |
| S.T.B. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. This work was funded and supported by the Australian Antarctic Division , Australian Antarctic Science project 4565. P.C. and K.A.H. are supported by NERC core funding to the BAS ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team and Environment Office, respectively. F.J.M is supported by Te Pūnaha Matatini , a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence. This article contributes to the ‘Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation’ (Ant-ICON) research programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) . We thank Anthony O'Grady, Ewan McIvor, Tessa Bird, James Fleming and Andy Sharman for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the 12 AAD staff that participated in the stakeholder workshops supporting this project. |