Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Systematic conservation planning for Antarctic research stations
Indexado
WoS WOS:001133990000001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85179128269
DOI 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.119711
Año 2024
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



The small ice-free areas of Antarctica are essential locations for both biodiversity and scientific research but are subject to considerable and expanding human impacts, resulting primarily from station-based research and support activities, and local tourism. Awareness by operators of the need to conserve natural values in and around station and visitor site footprints exists, but the cumulative nature of impacts often results in reactive rather than proactive management. With human activity spread across many isolated pockets of ice-free ground, the pathway to the greatest reduction of human impacts within this natural reserve is through better management of these areas, which are impacted the most. Using a case study of Australia's Casey Station, we found significant natural values persist within the immediate proximity (<10 m) of long-term station infrastructure, but encroachment by physical disturbance results in ongoing pressures. Active planning to better conserve such values would provide a direct opportunity to enhance protection of Antarctica's environment. Here we introduce an approach to systematic conservation planning, tailored to Antarctic research stations, to help managers improve the conservation of values surrounding their activity locations. Use of this approach provides a potential mechanism to balance the need for scientific access to the continent with international obligations to protect its environment. It may also facilitate the development of subordinate conservation tools, including management plans and natural capital accounting. By proactively minimising and containing their station footprints, national programs can also independently demonstrate their commitment to protecting Antarctica's environment.

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Environmental Sciences
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Brooks, Shaun T. - CSIRO Environm - Australia
Univ Tasmania - Australia
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - Australia
2 Jabour, Julia - Univ Tasmania - Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - Australia
3 Hughes, Kevin A. Hombre BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY - Reino Unido
4 Morgan, Fraser - Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res - Nueva Zelanda
UNIV AUCKLAND - Nueva Zelanda
The University of Auckland - Nueva Zelanda
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research - Nueva Zelanda
5 Convey, Peter Hombre BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY - Reino Unido
Univ Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica
Centro Internacional Cabo de Hornos (CHIC) - Chile
Millennium Inst Biodivers Antarctic & Subantarct E - Chile
University of Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica
Millennium Institute Biodiversity of Antarctic and Subantarctic Ecosystems (BASE) - Chile
6 Polymeropoulos, Elias T. Hombre Univ Tasmania - Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - Australia
7 Bergstrom, Dana M. Mujer UNIV WOLLONGONG - Australia
Univ Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica
Australian Antarctic Div - Australia
University of Wollongong - Australia
University of Johannesburg - República de Sudáfrica
Australian Antarctic División - Australia

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
NERC
Natural Environment Research Council
Biological Anthropology Section
Australian Antarctic Division, Australian Antarctic Science project
Te Punaha Matatini, a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence
Te Pūnaha Matatini
expert groups including the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
Committee for Environmental Protection

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
S.T.B. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. This work was funded and supported by the Australian Antarctic Division, Australian Antarctic Science project 4565. P.C. and K.A.H. are supported by NERC core funding to the BAS 'Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation' Team and Environment Office, respectively. F.J.M is supported by Te Punaha Matatini, a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence. This article contributes to the 'Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation' (Ant-ICON) research programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) . We thank Anthony O'Grady, Ewan McIvor, Tessa Bird, James Fleming and Andy Sharman for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the 12 AAD staff that participated in the stakeholder workshops supporting this project.
S.T.B. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. This work was funded and supported by the Australian Antarctic Division , Australian Antarctic Science project 4565. P.C. and K.A.H. are supported by NERC core funding to the BAS ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team and Environment Office, respectively. F.J.M is supported by Te Pūnaha Matatini , a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence. This article contributes to the ‘Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation’ (Ant-ICON) research programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) . We thank Anthony O'Grady, Ewan McIvor, Tessa Bird, James Fleming and Andy Sharman for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the 12 AAD staff that participated in the stakeholder workshops supporting this project.
S.T.B. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. This work was funded and supported by the Australian Antarctic Division , Australian Antarctic Science project 4565. P.C. and K.A.H. are supported by NERC core funding to the BAS ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team and Environment Office, respectively. F.J.M is supported by Te Pūnaha Matatini , a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence. This article contributes to the ‘Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation’ (Ant-ICON) research programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) . We thank Anthony O'Grady, Ewan McIvor, Tessa Bird, James Fleming and Andy Sharman for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the 12 AAD staff that participated in the stakeholder workshops supporting this project.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.