Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Knowledge of ground-dwelling beetle communities in the tropical Andes: Gaps and trends
Indexado
WoS WOS:001077027900001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85168612617
DOI 10.1111/AEC.13413
Año 2024
Tipo revisión

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



The tropical Andes is one of the most biodiverse ecoregions on Earth, exhibiting high levels of species endemism. The tropical Andes is also one of the most vulnerable ecoregions worldwide due to a long history of anthropogenic transformations. One of the major obstacles for generating conservation plans is gaps in knowledge about the status and threats to many groups of Andean biodiversity, especially invertebrates. Focusing on three important beetle groups (i.e., Coleoptera: ground beetles, rove beetles and dung beetles) in the tropical Andes, we performed a systematic review of scientific literature retrieving 50 studies that allowed us to assess the degree of knowledge across the region, disturbance types, and biodiversity metrics used. We found a high representation of studies in Colombia, compared with other Andean countries. We also found a marked bias among taxonomic groups, topics or metrics evaluated, with dung beetles the most represented group, particularly in studies addressing forest conversion using metrics such as species richness or abundance. We reveal large gaps in information on the diversity of ground and rove beetles, and in the use of other diversity metrics. The lack of information across countries makes it difficult to generalize results and points to the need for more research, especially in under-represented countries such as Bolivia and Venezuela. Including complementary response metrics, such as biomass, functional diversity or ecological functions, will improve the assessment of human impacts on tropical Andean beetle communities and wider ecosystems.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Austral Ecology 1442-9985

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Ecology
Scopus
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior And Systematics
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 López-Bedoya, Pablo A. - Universidad de Caldas - Colombia
Univ Caldas - Colombia
Univ Fed Lavras - Brasil
2 Magura, Tibor Hombre Debreceni Egyetem - Hungría
ELKH-DE Anthropocene Ecology Research Group - Hungría
Univ Debrecen - Hungría
ELKH DE Allergol Res Grp - Hungría
3 Méndez-Rojas, Diana M. - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - México
UNAM - México
4 NORIEGA-ALVARADO, JORGE ARI Hombre Universidad El Bosque - Colombia
Univ El Bosque - Colombia
5 Horgan, Finbarr G. Hombre EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology - Irlanda
Universidad Católica del Maule - Chile
EcoLaVerna Integral Restorat Ecol - Irlanda
6 Edwards, David P. Hombre The University of Sheffield - Reino Unido
UNIV SHEFFIELD - Reino Unido
UNIV CAMBRIDGE - Reino Unido

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Natural Environment Research Council
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (FAPEMIG)
Agriculture, and Conservation in Colombia/Biodiversidad, Agricultura, y Conservacion en Colombia (BACC) project
BACC
Agricultura, y Conservacion en Colombia

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
We thank Pierre Moret for their comments and suggestions, which allowed us to improve the criteria studies selection. We thank Maria Camila Angel and Nicolas Urbina for their help in generating figures. PALB was supported by a Master's scholarship from the Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (FAPEMIG). Funding was provided to D.P.E. from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/R017441/1), while T.M. was supported by the OTKA K‐131459 grant. This is article no. 37 of the Biodiversity, Agriculture, and Conservation in Colombia/Biodiversidad, Agricultura, y Conservacion en Colombia (BACC) project.
We thank Pierre Moret for their comments and suggestions, which allowed us to improve the criteria studies selection. We thank Maria Camila Angel and Nicolas Urbina for their help in generating figures. PALB was supported by a Master's scholarship from the Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (FAPEMIG). Funding was provided to D.P.E. from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/R017441/1), while T.M. was supported by the OTKA K-131459 grant. This is article no. 37 of the Biodiversity, Agriculture, and Conservation in Colombia/Biodiversidad, Agricultura, y Conservacion en Colombia (BACC) project.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.