Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1590/0101-3173.2023.V46N4.P135 | ||||
| Año | 2023 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
This article addresses the topic of artistic mímēsis, and attempts to illuminate the contemporary discussion between two seemingly irreconcilable positions. The first, framed in a traditional interpretation of Aristotelian texts, considers the work of art as an imitation of nature, finding in it its only rule. The second, supported by a different interpretation, states that, according to Aristotle himself, artistic creativity is fictional, that is, independent of natural reality, and therefore debtor only of the artist’s subjectivity. However, when considering the analogy between téchnē and phýsis, within Aristotle’s teleological worldview, it is possible to notice a kind of “common work” that harmonizes them. In this context, and advancing on the consideration of the mimetic poiésis, the philosopher’s texts allow an interpretation that, without detaching itself from the original naturalness of art and taking it as a guide, opens the horizon to the artist’s creativity.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brandi, Hugo Costarelli | - |
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo - Argentina
Universidad Gabriela Mistral - Chile UNIV NACL CUYO - Argentina |
| 2 | Fagés, Mariano | - |
Universidad Nacional de San Luis - Argentina
UNIV NACL SAN LUIS - Argentina Univ Nacl Villa Mercedes - Argentina |