Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.30965/26664275-BJA10073 | ||||
| Año | 2023 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Stephenson (2022) has argued that Kant’s thesis that all transcendental truths are transcendentally a priori knowable leads to omniscience of all transcendental truths. His arguments depend on luminosity principles and closure principles for transcendental knowability. We will argue that one pair of a luminosity and a closure principle should not be used, because the closure principle is too strong, while the other pair of a luminosity and a closure principle should not be used, because the luminosity principle is too strong. Stephenson’s argument also depends on a factivity principle for transcendental knowability, which we will argue to be false.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heylen, Jan | - |
KU Leuven - Bélgica
Katholieke Univ Leuven - Bélgica |
| 2 | Morales-Carbonell, Felipe | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek |
| Research Foundation-Flanders |
| ANID Beca FONDECYT |
| ANID Beca FONDECYT de Postdoctorado |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| Research for this article was funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (Project Grant G088219N) and an ANID Beca FONDECYT de Postdoctorado 3220017. We would like to thank Kristine Grigoryan for her help and feedback. |
| Research for this article was funded by the Research Foundation-Flanders (Project Grant G088219N) and an ANID Beca FONDECYT de Postdoctorado 3220017. We would like to thank Kristine Grigoryan for her help and feedback. |