Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.15691/0719-9112VOL11N1A9 | ||||
| Año | 2023 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Despite its modest appearance, paragraph 2 of article 2195 of the Civil Code has been an infallible source of conflict. What interests us in this study is the existence of a promise agreement as a defense of the occupant in the face of a “precario” action. The problem is the existence of two incompatible ideas or theories in the case law. Our objective is to show these ideas and propose a solution.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE LA MAZA-GAZMURI, INIGO ANDRES | Hombre |
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
|
|
| Mosqueira, Boris Loayza | Hombre |
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
|
|
| 1 | DE LA MAZA-GAZMURI, INIGO ANDRES | Hombre |
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
|
| 2 | Mosqueira, Boris Loayza | Hombre |
Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
|
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| * Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (inigo.delamaza@udp.cl). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-2837. Article received on August 3rd, 2022 and accepted for publication on November 2nd, 2022. Translated by Beatriz Larraín. This study is part of the FONDECYT Regular Grant No. 1220844, entitled "Passive legitimation without prior contract, by ignorance and mere tolerance of the owner: towards the best version of the decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of the action of “precario”, of which Iñigo de la Maza is the mainersarecher. |