Finally, we conclude by recognizing the main elements of the research results, including who intervenes and what roles the international agenda plays from the different positions occupied by the identified actors (high political authority, public officials, from international organizations and from the institutional feminist movement). In this sense, we conclude by determining that the role played by the international agenda has different functions for individuals depending on the position in which they find themselves: for senior political authorities, the international agenda does not mark a milestone that represents a before and after, but rather supports processes that are taking place at the national level; on the other hand,for public officials, the international agenda plays a more important role, in that it is capable of transmitting new ideas, through which public policy is developed; while for civil society, the international agenda is used to pressure states, and milestones that mark a before and after are recognized.The role of international conferences is recognized by all interviewees as a mediating and supportive role.In turn, the feminist movement identifies certain milestones as fundamental (IV World Conference on Women), but others are less relevant, such as the Consensuses emanating from the Regional Conferences on Women in Latin America and the Caribbean or the Declarations of the Legal and Social Commission onWomen.With respect to Security Council Resolution 1325, it is noted that for the feminist movement this did not constitute a strong demand and that it was implemented due to the will and knowledge of the officials in charge.The relevance of the Belem do Para Convention in the transmission of new knowledge is recognized by all, particularly for those who did not come from the feminist movement, as those who did had already incorporated the notions of violence from that treaty. In turn, with respect to the CEDAW, the presentation of reports by the state and civil society are all recognized as a milestone. However, it is also recognized that there is a lack of adequate implementation of the concluding observations regarding the examination of the state by the Committee, and this ends up being used by those who have knowledge on the subject.Likewise, from a critical analysis, certain final reflections are presented which, rather than closing the research topic, leave the way open to continue expanding the transfer of public policies and the implementation of international recommendations.In particular, this includes the role that institutional feminism can play so that we can speak of intersectional and transformative public policies of gender relations and not of maintaining the status quo.This remains the goal considering that since the beginning of the 1990s public policies have sought to eliminate discrimination and structural violence, and yet this continues to persist.