Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2023.02.007 | ||||
| Año | 2023 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Many animals are highly adapted to cover vast distances in search of ephemeral food resources. Pelagic seabirds have particularly wide-ranging foraging trips, made possible through efficient use of wind. During incubation, partners alternate long periods of fasting and so should adjust foraging and flight decisions according to the condition of the pair, as well as wind conditions experienced at sea. Here, we tracked incubating Juan Fernández petrels, Pterodroma externa, with GPS and immersion loggers, assigned at-sea behaviours using hidden Markov models, and weighed birds and their partners, to investigate the roles of wind and mass on flight and foraging behaviour, and the link between wind use and trip success. Birds conducted long anticlockwise looping trips, on average lasting 20.4 days and covering 10 741 km. They reached a region in the southeastern Pacific Ocean where prey search behaviour was concentrated, typically about 3400 km west of the colony. Outbound and return journeys appeared to broadly benefit from predictable southeasterly trade and westerly winds, respectively. Over finer scales, departure bearings were influenced by wind directions. Across trips, birds oriented predominantly with quartering tail winds which maximized ground speeds. Individuals experienced variable support from tail winds, and those that benefited more on outbound journeys (when winds were generally weaker) travelled faster, reached foraging areas more quickly and, over the entire trip, had higher mass gain per day at sea. Additionally, birds that were lighter on departure gained more mass and birds with heavier partners ranged further from the colony. Our results suggest that decisions involving where to go and how far, respectively, are based on prevailing wind patterns and an assessment of the condition of the pair. Consequently, while birds sought to benefit from wind assistance, those encountering greater tail wind support had more successful foraging trips, indicating that wind use may have direct fitness consequences.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clay, Thomas A. | Hombre |
University of California, Santa Cruz - Estados Unidos
University of Liverpool - Reino Unido Univ Calif Santa Cruz - Estados Unidos UNIV LIVERPOOL - Reino Unido |
| 2 | Hodum, Peter | Hombre |
Valparaíso Region - Chile
University of Puget Sound - Estados Unidos Oikonos Ecosyst Knowledge - Chile Univ Puget Sound - Estados Unidos |
| 3 | Hagen, Erin | Mujer |
River Partners - Estados Unidos
|
| 4 | Brooke, M. de L. | - |
University of Cambridge - Reino Unido
UNIV CAMBRIDGE - Reino Unido |
| Fuente |
|---|
| National Geographic Society |
| Royal Society for the Protection of Birds |
| National Geographic Society Explorer Grant |
| Editor Carl Soulsbury |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| We thank Steffen Oppel, Andrew Ausque and Nigel Butcher at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) for refurbishing loggers, Steffen for advice on downloading data from loggers and Andrew Howarth at Pathtrack and James Fox at Migrate Technology for advice and help with device management. We also thank Guillermo Araya, Nino Recabarren and Paola González for logistical support and the Editor Carl Soulsbury and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments, which helped improve the manuscript. The project was funded by a National Geographic Society Explorer Grant (NGS-59743R-19). |
| We thank Steffen Oppel, Andrew Ausque and Nigel Butcher at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) for refurbishing loggers, Steffen for advice on downloading data from loggers and Andrew Howarth at Pathtrack and James Fox at Migrate Technology for advice and help with device management. We also thank Guillermo Araya, Nino Recabarren and Paola González for logistical support and the Editor Carl Soulsbury and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments, which helped improve the manuscript. The project was funded by a National Geographic Society Explorer Grant (NGS-59743R-19). |
| We thank Steffen Oppel, Andrew Ausque and Nigel Butcher at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) for refurbishing loggers, Steffen for advice on downloading data from loggers and Andrew Howarth at Pathtrack and James Fox at Migrate Technology for advice and help with device management. We also thank Guillermo Araya, Nino Recabarren and Paola Gonz?alez for logistical support and the Editor Carl Soulsbury and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments, which helped improve the manuscript. The project was funded by a National Geographic Society Explorer Grant (NGS-59743R-19) . |