Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2023.106635 | ||||
| Año | 2023 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Addressing urban forest management and governance challenges is fundamental for implementing urban forest policies. Most of the evidence on this topic comes from Global North cities, so little is known about how urban forest management and governance are experienced by urban forest actors in Global South cities, including Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) cities. This study aimed to assess the views of urban forest actors in LAC cities on how they participate in collective decision-making, the current state of urban forest management and governance, and contact among actors, with a focus on how these views related to each other and differences among government and non-government actors. We designed and delivered an online survey to government and non-government actors in ten LAC capital cities, including Bogotá, Brasília, Buenos Aires, Ciudad de México, Ciudad de Panamá, La Paz, Lima, San José, San Juan, and Santiago de Chile. We analysed 155 responses using regression-based techniques. We found that more contact among actors resulted in more participation in collective decision making and more optimistic views about the state of urban forest management and governance. Also, more optimistic views about the state of urban forest management and governance resulted in more trust in local governments. Non-government actors had lower levels of trust in local governments than government actors. We discuss how implementing urban forest policies does not solely depend on having enough resources (e.g., finances, personnel) but also on engaging in collective decision-making and improving trust in the institutions in charge of implementing urban forest policies.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ordonez-Barona, Camilo | Hombre |
University of Toronto - Canadá
UNIV TORONTO - Canadá |
| 2 | Eleuterio, Ana Alice | Mujer |
Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-americana - Brasil
Univ Fed Integracao Latino Amer - Brasil |
| 3 | VASQUEZ-FUENTES, ALEXIS EMIR | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 4 | Devisscher, Tahia | - |
The University of British Columbia - Canadá
UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA - Canadá |
| 5 | Dias Baptista, Mariana | Mujer |
The University of Sheffield - Reino Unido
UNIV SHEFFIELD - Reino Unido |
| 6 | Dobbs, Cynnamon | - |
University of Connecticut - Estados Unidos
Univ Connecticut - Estados Unidos |
| 7 | Orozco-Aguilar, Luis | Hombre |
CATIE - Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza - Costa Rica
Ctr Agron Trop Invest & Ensenanza CATIE - Costa Rica |
| 8 | Meléndez-Ackerman, Elvia | Mujer |
Universidad de Puerto Rico - Puerto Rico
UNIV PUERTO RICO - Estados Unidos |
| Fuente |
|---|
| FONDECYT |
| National Science Foundation |
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| Universidade de São Paulo |
| Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada |
| National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) |
| FAO |
| SSHRC |
| University of British Columbia |
| Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo |
| National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center |
| USDA-FS |
| National Research Academy |
| UFLAC |
| Second Latin-American Urban Forest Fora |
| Foro para América Latina y el Caribe sobre Bosques Urbanos y Periurbanos |
| United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization |
| Latin America & the Caribbean |
| rica Latina y el Caribe sobre Bosques Urbanos y Periurbanos |
| Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) |
| Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Partnership Engage and Devel- opment Grants |
| Canadian Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship program |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This work was authored by the Urban Forests in Latin America & the Caribbean (UFLAC) collaborative research network with support from the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), under funding received from the National Science Foundation (grant number DBI-1639145). CO was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Partnership Engage and Development Grants (No. 512059 and 511621). TD was supported by the Canadian Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship program (201709BPF-393653-294704), in partnership with SSHRC. CD was supported by Fondecyt 11190295 grant from the National Research Academy (ANID). Special thanks to Dr. Francisco Javier Escobedo (USDA-FS), Nuria Mónica Navarro (University of British Columbia), and Dr. Demóstenes Ferreira da Silva Filho (University of São Paulo) for their earlier contributions to UFLAC and advice on early version of this manuscript. This work would have not been possible without the help of Simone Borelli and Michela Conigliaro from the Trees for Cities group of the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the organizers of the First and Second Latin-American Urban Forest Fora (Foro para América Latina y el Caribe sobre Bosques Urbanos y Periurbanos, Lima 2017 y Bogotá 2019). Finally, many thanks to the two anonymous reviewers for their recommendations, which helped improve the manuscript. |
| This work was authored by the Urban Forests in Latin America & the Caribbean (UFLAC) collaborative research network with support from the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), under funding received from the National Science Foundation (grant number DBI-1639145). CO was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Partnership Engage and Development Grants (No. 512059 and 511621). TD was supported by the Canadian Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship program (201709BPF-393653-294704), in partnership with SSHRC. CD was supported by Fondecyt 11190295 grant from the National Research Academy (ANID). Special thanks to Dr. Francisco Javier Escobedo (USDA-FS), Nuria Mónica Navarro (University of British Columbia), and Dr. Demóstenes Ferreira da Silva Filho (University of São Paulo) for their earlier contributions to UFLAC and advice on early version of this manuscript. This work would have not been possible without the help of Simone Borelli and Michela Conigliaro from the Trees for Cities group of the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the organizers of the First and Second Latin-American Urban Forest Fora (Foro para América Latina y el Caribe sobre Bosques Urbanos y Periurbanos, Lima 2017 y Bogotá 2019). Finally, many thanks to the two anonymous reviewers for their recommendations, which helped improve the manuscript. |
| This work was authored by the Urban Forests in Latin America & the Caribbean (UFLAC) collaborative research network with support from the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) , under funding received from the National Science Foundation (grant number DBI-1639145) . CO was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Partnership Engage and Devel- opment Grants (No. 512059 and 511621) . TD was supported by the Canadian Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship program (201709BPF- 393653-294704) , in partnership with SSHRC. CD was supported by Fondecyt 11190295 grant from the National Research Academy (ANID) . Special thanks to Dr. Francisco Javier Escobedo (USDA -FS) , Nuria M ? onica Navarro (University of British Columbia) , and Dr. Dem ? ostenes Ferreira da Silva Filho (University of Sa ? o Paulo) for their earlier con- tributions to UFLAC and advice on early version of this manuscript. This work would have not been possible without the help of Simone Borelli and Michela Conigliaro from the Trees for Cities group of the United Nations? Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) , and the organizers of the First and Second Latin-American Urban Forest Fora (Foro para Ame ? rica Latina y el Caribe sobre Bosques Urbanos y Periurbanos, Lima 2017 y Bogot ? a 2019) . Finally, many thanks to the two anonymous re- viewers for their recommendations, which helped improve the manuscript. |