Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



ROBOT Assisted Laparoscopic Surgeries For Nononcological Urologic Disease: Initial Experience With Hugo Ras System
Indexado
WoS WOS:000976524300001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85149813674
DOI 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2023.01.042
Año 2023
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Objective: To report our initial experience with the use of HUGO Robotic Assisted Surgery System (RAS) for nononcological urologic disease. Methods: We collected retrospective data describing clinical outcomes from patients undergoing surgeries for nononcological urologic disease with the new HUGO RAS. Analysis included: total surgery and console time, docking time, estimated bleeding, complications, and pain after surgery. Results: There were 5 patients operated for nononcological urologic disease. The mean age was 50 years (range 32-70), comorbidities were mild (2 patients with chronic hypertension) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was 2. Total surgical time ranged from 150 to 257 minutes, and console time from 89 to 164 minutes, each depending on the intervention. The mean docking time was 8.5 minutes (range 5.7-11). No intraoperative complications, instrument clashes, or system failure that compromised the surgery's completion were recorded. Mean blood loss ranged from 10-30 mL, and there were no postoperative complications. Postoperative pain classified from 0-10 at 1, 6, and 12 hours was low (range 0-3), and pain before discharge was 0 for all patients. Hospital stay ranged from 2 to 5 days, depending on the intervention. Conclusion: Robotic surgery was introduced in early 2000s and was rapidly adopted. Initially, this technology was reserved for oncological surgery, later expanding to nononcological conditions. These preliminary results are comparable to the previous robotic systems, suggesting the multiple potential uses of the HUGO RAS. The adoption of this technology has the potential to improve patient accessibility for less-invasive therapies in developing countries.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Urology 0090-4295

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Urology & Nephrology
Scopus
Urology
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Elorrieta, Vicente Hombre Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
Clínica Santa María - Chile
2 Villena, José Hombre Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
Clínica Santa María - Chile
3 Kompatzki, Alvaro Hombre Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
Clínica Santa María - Chile
4 Velasco, Alfredo Hombre Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
Clínica Santa María - Chile
5 Salvado, Jose A. Hombre Universidad Finis Terrae - Chile
Clínica Santa María - Chile

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Sin Información

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
Statement of Ethics: All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and local scientific research ethics committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. Upon recruitment, each patient provided written informed consent. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by local “Scientific ethics committee”, belonging to Clínica Santa María, approval act date October 18th, 2021 (the name of the ethics committee is: “Comité Ético Científico de Clínica Santa María”). Funding Support: No funding was received by any sponsor or source for the preparation of data for the manuscript for this study.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.