Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Effects of soil water restriction on root growth and root morphology of perennial ryegrass and pasture brome 多年生黑麦草、雀麦根系形态和生长对土壤干旱的适应性
Indexado
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85142505469
DOI 10.12357/CJEA.20220336
Año 2022
Tipo

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



To study the adaptability of herb roots to drought environments, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and pasture brome (Bromus valdivianus) were supplied 80%–85% plant available water (PAW) and 20%–25% PAW in a pot experiment. By analyzing of root appearance, biomass accumulation, and root morphology of perennial ryegrass and pasture brome, an effective production strategy for the two forage grasses under extreme drought stress was explored. The results showed that the appearance of the root tips differed slightly between the two forage grasses. Pasture brome had long and dense root hair and a long elongation area in the root tips, whereas perennial ryegrass had sparse root hair and a short elongation area. Extreme drought stress (20%–25% PAW) resulted in uneven root thickness and malformation in perennial ryegrass. No obvious damage was observed in pasture brome roots. There was no significant difference between species and soil water content in terms of biomass accumulation and distribution in the shoots and roots of the two forage grasses. However, there were significant differences in root length, root area, root diameter, root tips, and root forks between the perennial ryegrass and pasture brome. The root quantity of perennial ryegrass was significantly higher than that of brome (P≤0.01); the root length and root area were approximately 1.5 times those of pasture brome; and the root tips and forks were more than twice those of pasture brome. Pasture brome roots were significantly thicker than perennial ryegrass roots, with root diameters of 0.315 mm and 0.259 mm, respectively. The lateral root branches of the pasture brome root were short, thick, and dense, whereas the lateral roots of the perennial ryegrass were long and thin. Drought stress significantly reduced the total root length of the two forage species and promoted the radial growth of roots in the pasture brome. In conclusion, pasture brome had a more developed root-hair-area, and perennial ryegrass had more root quantity. Therefore, perennial ryegrass is distinguished mainly by its root quantity and adopts an adaptive strategy of extensive water absorption, whereas pasture brome is distinguished by well-developed root hair, high lateral root branch density (quality), and adaptive strategies to ensure effective water absorption.

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Sin Disciplinas
Scopus
Agronomy And Crop Science
Soil Science
Plant Science
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior And Systematics
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Zhang, Yongmei - Gansu Agricultural University - China
2 Hu, Haiying - Ningxia University - China
3 Bai, Xiaoming - Gansu Agricultural University - China
4 Cory, Matthew - Massey University - Nueva Zelanda
5 Javier, García Favre - Massey University - Nueva Zelanda
6 Iván, Ordóñez P. - Massey University - Nueva Zelanda
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - Chile

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province
Science and Technology Support Project of Grassland Ecological Restoration and Management of Gansu Forestry and Grassland Bureau

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
This study was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province (20JR10RA564) and the Science and Technology Support Project of Grassland Ecological Restoration and Management of Gansu Forestry and Grassland Bureau (GSLC-2020-3).

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.