Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.JSE.2022.02.025 | ||||
| Año | 2022 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Background: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) may potentially improve humeral osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the deviation between planned and postosteotomy humeral inclination, retrotorsion, and height in shoulder arthroplasty, using PSI vs. standard cutting guides (SCG). Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were allocated to undergo humeral osteotomy using either PSI or SCG, such that the 2 groups have similar age, gender, and side. Preosteotomy computed tomography (CT) scan was performed and used for the 3-dimensional (3D) planning. The osteotomy procedure was performed using a PSI designed for each specimen or an SCG depending on the group. A postosteotomy CT scan was performed. The preosteotomy and postosteotomy 3D CT scan reconstructions were superimposed to calculate the deviation between planned and postosteotomy inclination, retrotorsion, and height. Outliers were defined as cases with 1 or more of the following deviations: >5° inclination, >10° retrotorsion, and >3 mm height. The deviation and outliers in inclination, retrotorsion, and height were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The deviations between planned and postosteotomy parameters were similar among the PSI and SCG groups for inclination (P = .260), whereas they were significantly greater in the SCG group for retrotorsion (P < .001) and height (P = .003). There were 8 outliers in the SCG group, compared with only 1 outlier in the PSI group (P = .005). Most outliers in the SCG group were due to deviation >10° in retrotorsion. Conclusion: After 3D planning, PSI had less deviation between planned and postosteotomy humeral retrotorsion and height, relative to SCG.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rojas, J. Tomas | Hombre |
Sonnenhof Orthopaedic Center - Suiza
Clínica Santa María - Chile Sonnenhof Orthopaed - Suiza Hospital San José - Chile |
| 2 | Jost, Bernhard | Hombre |
Kantonsspital St Gallen - Suiza
Kantonsspital - Suiza Kantonsspital St.Gallen - Suiza |
| 3 | Hertel, Ralph | Hombre |
Lindenhofspital - Suiza
|
| 4 | Zipeto, Claudio | Hombre |
Medacta International SA - Suiza
Medacta Int SA - Suiza |
| 5 | Van Rooij, Floris | Hombre |
ReSurg SA - Suiza
|
| 6 | Zumstein, Matthias A. | Hombre |
Sonnenhof Orthopaedic Center - Suiza
Sportsclinicnumber1 - Suiza University Hospital Bern - Suiza Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine - Suiza Sonnenhof Orthopaed - Suiza Sportsclin 1 - Suiza Bern Univ Hosp - Suiza Swiss Inst Translat & Entrepreneurial Med - Suiza sitem-insel AG - Suiza |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| Conflicts of interest: Bernhard Jost receives royalties, a research grant, and is a designer for Medacta. Ralph Hertel receives royalties, and is a designer for Medacta. Matthias A. Zumstein receives a research grant and is a designer for Medacta. The other authors and their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. |