Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Laparoscopic Compared with Open D2 Gastrectomy on Perioperative and Long-Term, Stage-Stratified Oncological Outcomes for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the IMIGASTRIC Database
Indexado
WoS WOS:000699110300001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85114357625
DOI 10.3390/CANCERS13184526
Año 2021
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Background: The laparoscopic approach in gastric cancer surgery is being increasingly adopted worldwide. However, studies focusing specifically on laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy are still lacking in the literature. This retrospective study aimed to compare the short‐term and long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: The protocol‐based, international IMIGASTRIC (International study group on Minimally Invasive surgery for Gastric Cancer) registry was queried to retrieve data on patients undergoing laparoscopic or open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer with curative intent from January 2000 to December 2014. Eleven predefined, demographical, clinical, and pathological variables were used to conduct a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to investigate intraoperative and recovery outcomes, complications, pathological findings, and survival data between the two groups. Predictive factors of long‐term survival were also assessed. Results: A total of 3033 patients from 14 participating institutions were selected from the IMIGASTRIC database. After 1:1 PSM, a total of 1248 patients, 624 in the laparoscopic group and 624 in the open group, were matched and included in the final analysis. The total operative time (median 180 versus 240 min, p < 0.0001) and the length of the postoperative hospital stay (median 10 versus 14.8 days, p < 0.0001) were longer in the open group than in the laparoscopic group. The conversion to open rate was 1.9%. The proportion of patients with in‐hospital complications was higher in the open group (21.3% versus 15.1%, p = 0.004). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the laparoscopic approach (median 32 versus 28, p < 0.0001), and the proportion of positive resection margins was higher (p = 0.021) in the open group (5.9%) than in the laparoscopic group (3.2%). There was no significant difference between the groups in five‐year overall survival rates (77.4% laparoscopic versus 75.2% open, p = 0.229). Conclusion: The adoption of the laparoscopic approach for gastric resection with D2 lymphadenectomy shortened the length of hospital stay and reduced postoperative complications with respect to the open approach. The five‐year overall survival rate after laparoscopy was comparable to that for patients who underwent open D2 resection. The types of surgical approaches are not independent predictive factors for five‐year overall survival.

Revista



Revista ISSN
Cancers 2072-6694

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Oncology
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Trastulli, Stefano Hombre Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni - Italia
Azienda Osped Santa Maria - Italia
2 Desiderio, Jacopo Hombre Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni - Italia
Sapienza Università di Roma - Italia
Azienda Osped Santa Maria - Italia
Sapienza Univ Rome - Italia
3 Lin, Jian Xian - Fujian Medical University - China
Fujian Med Univ - China
Tianjin Medical University - China
4 Reim, Daniel Hombre Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München - Alemania
TECH UNIV MUNICH - Alemania
Klinikum Rechts Der Isar - Alemania
5 Zheng, Chao Hui - Fujian Medical University - China
Fujian Med Univ - China
Tianjin Medical University - China
6 Borghi, Felice - Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle - Italia
Santa Croce & Carle Hosp - Italia
7 Cianchi, Fabio Hombre Università degli Studi di Firenze - Italia
UNIV FLORENCE - Italia
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia - Italia
8 NORERO-MUNOZ, ENRIQUE Hombre Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
9 Nguyen, Ninh T. T. - UCI Medical Center - Estados Unidos
Univ Calif - Estados Unidos
10 Qi, Feng - Tianjin Medical University - China
Tianjin Med Univ - China
11 Coratti, Andrea Mujer Ospedale della Misericordia, Grosseto - Italia
Misericordia Hosp Grosseto - Italia
12 Cesari, Maurizio Hombre “Alto Tevere” Hospital of Città di Castello - Italia
Hosp Citta Castello - Italia
13 Bazzocchi, Francesca Mujer IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza - Italia
Fdn IRCCS Casa Sollievo Sofferenza - Italia
14 Alimoglu, Orhan Hombre Istanbul Medeniyet University - Turquía
Istanbul Medeniyet Univ - Turquía
15 Brower, Steven T. T. Hombre Englewood Hospital and Medical Center - Estados Unidos
Englewood Hosp & Med Ctr - Estados Unidos
16 Pernazza, Graziano Hombre Complesso Ospedaliero San Giovanni - Addolorata - Italia
San Giovanni Addolorata Hosp - Italia
17 D’imporzano, Simone Mujer Università di Pisa - Italia
Med Univ Pisa - Italia
18 Azagra, Juan Santiago Hombre Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg - Luxemburgo
Ctr Hosp Luxembourg - Luxemburgo
19 Zhou, Yan Bing Hombre Qingdao University - China
Qingdao Univ - China
20 Cao, Shou Gen Hombre Qingdao University - China
Qingdao Univ - China
21 Garofoli, Eleonora Mujer Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni - Italia
Azienda Osped Santa Maria - Italia
22 Mosillo, Claudia Mujer Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni - Italia
Azienda Osped Santa Maria - Italia
23 Guerra, Francesco Hombre Ospedale della Misericordia, Grosseto - Italia
Misericordia Hosp Grosseto - Italia
24 Liu, Tong - Tianjin Medical University - China
Tianjin Med Univ - China
25 Arcuri, Giacomo Hombre Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia - Italia
Osped S Maria Misericordia - Italia
26 GONZALEZ-CANDIA, PAULINA Mujer Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
27 Staderini, Fabio Hombre Università degli Studi di Firenze - Italia
UNIV FLORENCE - Italia
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia - Italia
28 Marano, Alessandra Mujer Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle - Italia
Santa Croce & Carle Hosp - Italia
28 Borghi, Felice Hombre Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle - Italia
Santa Croce & Carle Hosp - Italia
29 Terrenato, Irene Mujer IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute - Italia
IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst - Italia
30 D’andrea, Vito Hombre Sapienza Università di Roma - Italia
Sapienza Univ Rome - Italia
31 Bracarda, Sergio Hombre Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni - Italia
Azienda Osped Santa Maria - Italia
32 Huang, Chang Ming - Fujian Medical University - China
Fujian Med Univ - China
Tianjin Medical University - China
33 Parisi, Amilcare Hombre Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni - Italia
Azienda Osped Santa Maria - Italia

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Sin Información

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
Sin Información

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.