Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.3389/FEDUC.2021.731763 | ||||
| Año | 2021 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Middle bias has been reported for responses to multiple-choice test items used in educational assessment. It has been claimed that this response bias probably occurs because test developers tend to place correct responses among middle options, tests thus presenting a middle-biased distribution of answer keys. However, this response bias could be driven by strong distractors being more frequently located among middle options. In this study, the frequency of responses to a Chilean national examination used to rank students wanting to access higher education was used to categorize distractors based on attractiveness level. The distribution of different distractor types (best distractor, non-functioning distractors…) was analyzed across 110 tests of 80 five-option items administered to assess several disciplines in five consecutive years. Results showed that the strongest distractors were more frequently found among middle options, most commonly at option C. In contrast, the weakest distractors were more frequently found at the last option (E). This pattern did not substantially vary across disciplines or years. Supplementary analyses revealed that a similar position bias for distractors could be observed in tests administered in countries other than Chile. Thus, the location of different types of distractors might provide an alternative explanation for the middle bias reported in literature for tests’ responses. Implications for test developers, test takers, and researchers in the field are discussed.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lions, Severin | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 2 | Monsalve, Carlos | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 3 | DARTNELL-ROY, PABLO RICARDO | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 4 | Godoy, Maria Ines | Mujer |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 5 | Córdova, Nora | Mujer |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 6 | Jiménez, Daniela | Mujer |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 7 | Blanco, María Paz | Mujer |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 8 | Ortega, Gabriel | Hombre |
Universidad de Chile - Chile
|
| 9 | Lemarié, Julie | Mujer |
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Francia
Univ Toulouse - Francia Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie - Francia |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Fondef |
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| ANID |
| Center for Advanced Research in Education |
| ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado |
| ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Advanced Research in Education) |
| ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Mathematical Modeling) |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| This research was supported by the following grants from ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado #3190273 and FONDEF ID16I10090. Support from ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence FB0003 (Center for Advanced Research in Education) and AFB170001 (Center for Mathematical Modeling) is also gratefully acknowledged. |
| This research was supported by the following grants from ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado #3190273 and FONDEF ID 16I10090. Support from ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence FB0003 (Center for Advanced Research in Education) and AFB170001 (Center for Mathematical Modeling) is also gratefully acknowledged. |