Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



The Position of Distractors in Multiple-Choice Test Items: The Strongest Precede the Weakest
Indexado
WoS WOS:000717693300001
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85118988922
DOI 10.3389/FEDUC.2021.731763
Año 2021
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Middle bias has been reported for responses to multiple-choice test items used in educational assessment. It has been claimed that this response bias probably occurs because test developers tend to place correct responses among middle options, tests thus presenting a middle-biased distribution of answer keys. However, this response bias could be driven by strong distractors being more frequently located among middle options. In this study, the frequency of responses to a Chilean national examination used to rank students wanting to access higher education was used to categorize distractors based on attractiveness level. The distribution of different distractor types (best distractor, non-functioning distractors…) was analyzed across 110 tests of 80 five-option items administered to assess several disciplines in five consecutive years. Results showed that the strongest distractors were more frequently found among middle options, most commonly at option C. In contrast, the weakest distractors were more frequently found at the last option (E). This pattern did not substantially vary across disciplines or years. Supplementary analyses revealed that a similar position bias for distractors could be observed in tests administered in countries other than Chile. Thus, the location of different types of distractors might provide an alternative explanation for the middle bias reported in literature for tests’ responses. Implications for test developers, test takers, and researchers in the field are discussed.

Revista



Revista ISSN
2504-284X

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Sin Disciplinas
Scopus
Sin Disciplinas
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Lions, Severin Hombre Universidad de Chile - Chile
2 Monsalve, Carlos Hombre Universidad de Chile - Chile
3 DARTNELL-ROY, PABLO RICARDO Hombre Universidad de Chile - Chile
4 Godoy, Maria Ines Mujer Universidad de Chile - Chile
5 Córdova, Nora Mujer Universidad de Chile - Chile
6 Jiménez, Daniela Mujer Universidad de Chile - Chile
7 Blanco, María Paz Mujer Universidad de Chile - Chile
8 Ortega, Gabriel Hombre Universidad de Chile - Chile
9 Lemarié, Julie Mujer Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Francia
Univ Toulouse - Francia
Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie - Francia

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Fondef
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
ANID
Center for Advanced Research in Education
ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado
ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Advanced Research in Education)
ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Mathematical Modeling)

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
This research was supported by the following grants from ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado #3190273 and FONDEF ID16I10090. Support from ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence FB0003 (Center for Advanced Research in Education) and AFB170001 (Center for Mathematical Modeling) is also gratefully acknowledged.
This research was supported by the following grants from ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado #3190273 and FONDEF ID 16I10090. Support from ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence FB0003 (Center for Advanced Research in Education) and AFB170001 (Center for Mathematical Modeling) is also gratefully acknowledged.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.