Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Organic carbon bioavailability: Is it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process?
Indexado
WoS WOS:000687095700013
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85105304131
DOI 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.147390
Año 2021
Tipo revisión

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Organic carbon can affect the biological nitrogen removal process since the Anammox, heterotrophic and denitrifying bacteria have different affinities and feedback in relation to carbon/nitrogen ratio. Therefore, we reviewed the wastewater carbon concentration, its biodegradability and bioavailability to choose the appropriate nitrogen removal process between conventional (nitrification-denitrification) and Anammox-based process (i.e. integrated with the partial nitritation, nitritation, simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification or partial-denitrification). This review will cover: (i) strategies to choose the best nitrogen removal route according to the wastewater characteristics in relation to the organic matter bioavailability and biodegradability; (ii) strategies to efficiently remove nitrogen and the remaining carbon from effluent in anammox-based process and its operating cost; (iii) an economic analysis to determine the operational costs of two-units Anammox-based process when compared with the commonly applied one-unit Anammox system (partial-nitritation-Anammox). On this review, a list of alternatives are summarized and explained for different nitrogen and biodegradable organic carbon concentrations, which are the main factors to determine the best treatment process, based on operational and economic terms. In summary, it depends on the wastewater carbon biodegradability, which implies in the wastewater treatment cost. Thus, to apply the conventional nitrification/denitrification process a CODb/N ratio higher than 3.5 is required to achieve full nitrogen removal efficiency. For an economic point of view, according to the analysis the minimum CODb/gN for successful nitrogen removal by nitrification/denitrification is 5.8 g. If ratios lower than 3.5 are applied, for successfully higher nitrogen removal rates and the economic feasibility of the treatment, Anammox-based routes can be applied to the wastewater treatment plant.

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Environmental Sciences
Scopus
Waste Management And Disposal
Pollution
Environmental Engineering
Environmental Chemistry
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Bonassa, Gabriela Mujer Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - Brasil
Western Parana State Univ - Brasil
2 Bolsan, Alice Chiapetti Mujer Western Santa Catarina University - Brasil
Western Santa Catarina Univ - Brasil
3 Hollas, Camila Ester Mujer Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - Brasil
Western Parana State Univ - Brasil
4 Venturin, Bruno Hombre Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - Brasil
Western Parana State Univ - Brasil
5 Candido, Daniela Mujer Federal University of Fronteira Sul - Brasil
Fed Univ Fronteira Sul - Brasil
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - Brasil
6 Chini, Angélica Mujer Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - Brasil
Western Parana State Univ - Brasil
7 De Prá, Marina C. Mujer Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - Brasil
8 Antes, Fabiane Goldschmidt Mujer Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa - Brasil
Embrapa Suinos & Aves - Brasil
9 CAMPOS-GOMEZ, JOSE LUIS Hombre Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez - Chile
10 Kunz, Airton - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná - Brasil
Federal University of Fronteira Sul - Brasil
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa - Brasil
Western Parana State Univ - Brasil
Fed Univ Fronteira Sul - Brasil
Embrapa Suinos & Aves - Brasil
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - Brasil

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
CAPES
CNPq
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
SISTRATES FUNTEC-BNDES

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
Authors thanks financial support from CAPES , CNPq , SISTRATES FUNTEC-BNDES (grant number 15.2.0837.1 ) and ANID/FONDAP/15130015 .
Authors thanks financial support from CAPES, CNPq, SISTRATES FUNTEC-BNDES (grant number 15.2.0837.1) and ANID/FONDAP/15130015.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.