Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2021.105358 | ||||
| Año | 2021 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Domestic dogs have a close and mutualistic relationship with humans. When unconfined, they usually stay close to the owner's home, but some undertake intensive forays in nature with negative impacts on wildlife. Predictors for such problematic dogs in previous research concentrated on dog characteristics and husbandry. Here we additionally explored which aspects of the dog-human bond influenced the movements of free-ranging village dogs in southern Chile. Using an interdisciplinary framework, we assessed the strength of this relationship through (i) attachment behaviours performed during the Strange Situation Procedure (SSP, dog's perception of the relationship) and (ii) the Monash Dog-Owner Relationship Scale questionnaire (MDORS, owner's perception) in 41 dog-owner dyads while remotely monitoring the dogs' movements using GPS tracking (n = 36394 locations). We found that 39 % of dogs had > 5 % of their locations in natural areas, but only three individuals exhibited overnight excursions. Home range size (1.8-4227 ha) and mean distances to the owner's home (0-28.4 km) varied greatly among individuals. Through generalized linear models we identified that dogs had larger home ranges, moved farther away from home or accessed nature more (i.e., they exhibited more intensive forays) when they explored more, greeted their owners intensively, and expressed more passive behaviours in the presence of their owners (SSP). However, the MDORS questionnaire was a poor predictor of home range, distance to home, and access to nature. When considering the dogs' background, older dogs, males, and dogs that got missing more frequently exhibited more intensive forays. Compared to SSP results in confined dogs, we suggest that owners of free-ranging dogs do not play an important role as an attachment figure. We conclude that the dog-owner bond indeed influences roaming behaviour in dogs. This highlights the necessity of wildlife management strategies considering the cultural context. In specific terms, we recommend to foster the knowledge of the importance of bonds between dogs and their owners in educational campaigns on responsible dog ownership, along with biological (age, sex) and behavioural characteristics (exploration, getting missing). That way, awareness campaigns can focus on owners of possible problematic dogs.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saavedra-Aracena, Lorena | Mujer |
Universidad de Magallanes - Chile
|
| 2 | Grimm-Seyfarth, Annegret | Mujer |
UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res - Alemania
Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung - Alemania |
| 3 | Schuttler, Elke | Mujer |
Universidad de Magallanes - Chile
Omora Pk Field Stn - Chile Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad - Chile |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research |
| PAI-CONICYT |
| Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (PAI-CONICYT) |
| Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB, Basal Funding ANID) |
| Roy Mackenzie |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| We are grateful to all dog-caregiver dyads participating in this study. We also wish to thank Francisca Avila for performing the role of the stranger in the SSP, Mauro Rojas for the health check, and Roy Mack-enzie for advice in PCA analysis. Special thanks to Fernando Cardenas, Nancyrose Houston, Jaime E. Jimenez, Javier Rendoll, Maximilano Sepulveda, Eduardo A. SilvaRodriguez, and Amy Wynia for improvingearlier versions of the manuscript. This work was financed by the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (PAI-CONICYT, Call 2014, No. 79140024 and Master Grant, Call 2017, No. 22170697) and by the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB, Basal Funding ANID-AFB170008) . |
| We are grateful to all dog-caregiver dyads participating in this study. We also wish to thank Francisca Avila for performing the role of the stranger in the SSP, Mauro Rojas for the health check, and Roy Mackenzie for advice in PCA analysis. Special thanks to Fernando C?rdenas, Nancyrose Houston, Jaime E. Jim?nez, Javier Rendoll, Maximilano Sep?lveda, Eduardo A. Silva-Rodr?guez, and Amy Wynia for improving earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was financed by the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (PAI-CONICYT, Call 2014, No. 79140024 and Master Grant, Call 2017, No. 22170697) and by the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB, Basal Funding ANID-AFB170008). |
| We are grateful to all dog-caregiver dyads participating in this study. We also wish to thank Francisca Avila for performing the role of the stranger in the SSP, Mauro Rojas for the health check, and Roy Mackenzie for advice in PCA analysis. Special thanks to Fernando C?rdenas, Nancyrose Houston, Jaime E. Jim?nez, Javier Rendoll, Maximilano Sep?lveda, Eduardo A. Silva-Rodr?guez, and Amy Wynia for improving earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was financed by the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (PAI-CONICYT, Call 2014, No. 79140024 and Master Grant, Call 2017, No. 22170697) and by the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB, Basal Funding ANID-AFB170008). |