In Case No 2261-2018, the Court of Appeals of Valdivia rejected an constitucional protection action because the dignity-threatening acts adduced by the appellant were being known in a criminal case about defamation. However, the appellant also reported a series of other psychological harassment acts such as loitering, repeated calls and messages, which the Court did not address. In Chile, the victim cannot stop these acts through criminal procedure, since what is known in Comparative Law as 'Stalking' has not been criminally regulated. Thereby, the Court left the appellant unprotected against acts that alter the normal development of daily life, violating constitutional rights.