Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial
Indexado
WoS WOS:000576787400005
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85085646991
DOI 10.1016/J.JCLINANE.2020.109907
Año 2020
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Study objective: Comparison of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Randomized equivalence trial. Setting: University Hospital. Patients: Sixty patients undergoing primary THA. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided LPB (n = 30) or SIFIB (n = 30). The local anesthetic agent (40 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 μg/mL) and block adjuvant (4 mg of intravenous dexamethasone) were identical in all subjects. Postoperatively, all patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (morphine) as well as acetaminophen and ketoprofen during 48 h. Measurements: A blinded investigator recorded morphine consumption at 24 and 48 h as well as time to first morphine request, pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, incidence of adverse events, time to readiness for discharge, and length of hospital stay. The blinded investigator also carried out sensorimotor block assessment at 3, 6 and 24 h using a 10-point sensorimotor composite scale. Main results: No intergroup differences were found in terms of cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h (95% CI: −4.0 mg to 2.0 mg) and 48 h (95% CI, −5.0 mg to 2.0 mg) or time to first morphine request. Furthermore, pain scores were similar at all time intervals after 3 h. There were no intergroup differences in terms of composite sensorimotor scores at 3 and 6 h. However, SIFIB lasted longer than lumbar plexus block as evidenced by a higher composite score at 24 h. No intergroup differences were found in terms of complications. Compared with LPB, SIFIB was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge (3 [1-4] vs. 2 [1-3] days; P = 0.042) and length of hospital stay (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-4] days; P = 0.048). Conclusions: For THA, no differences were found between LPB and SIFIB in terms of breakthrough morphine requirement and pain control. However, SIFIB resulted in a longer block and was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge as well as decreased hospital stay.

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Anesthesiology
Scopus
Anesthesiology And Pain Medicine
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 BRAVO-ADVIS, DANIELA Mujer Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
2 LAYERA-RAMOS, SEBASTIAN Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
3 ALISTE-MUNOZ, JULIAN HERNANDO Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
4 Jara, Alvaro Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
5 Fernandez, Diego Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
6 Barrientos, Cristian Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
7 Wulf, Rodrigo Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
8 MUNOZ-FIGUEROA, GONZALO LUIS Hombre Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile - Chile
Universidad de Chile - Chile
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile - Chile
9 Finlayson, Roderick J. Hombre McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital - Canadá
MCGILL UNIV - Canadá
10 Tran, De Q. - McGill University - Canadá
MCGILL UNIV - Canadá
Université McGill - Canadá

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento



Fuente
Dana Rothfeld

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
The authors thank Dr. Estela Maulén, Dr. María Mercedes Aguirre, Ada Tapia (physiotherapist) and Dana Rothfeld (physiotherapist) for their assistance with patient recruitment. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors and the authors declare no competing interests.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.