Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2018.09.018 | ||||
| Año | 2018 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
The current boom of private conservation reveals a strong alignment between neoliberal processes of dispossession and environmentalism. Yet, private conservation can also serve as the setting for the development of critical environmental agendas raised by NGOs. Based on ethnographic research in the southern Chilean Andes, this article shows that dispossession and collaboration are intertwined features of private conservation. These two processes are engendered by changes affecting not only farmers' access to natural resources, but also their specific forms of engagement with landscape constitutive of senses of belonging. Property constitutes a compelling technology in the enforcement of wilderness enclosures and yet it can offer means for farmers to mediate between conservation and farming concerns. Attention to mediations and property exposes the ambivalences of private conservation under neoliberalism.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Di Giminiani, Piergiorgio | Hombre |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
|
| 2 | Fonck, Martin | Hombre |
Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen - Alemania
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München - Alemania |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile |
| CIIR |
| Fondecyt Regular |
| Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Campinas |
| Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval, University of Massachusetts Amherst |
| VRI Interdisciplina at Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile |
| Francisca de la Maza |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| We would like to acknowledge the members of Guia Grupo Cani for facilitating our research, and our many generous interviewees in southern Chile. Research for this article was supported by CIIR under grant CONICYT/FONDAP/15110006, VRI Interdisciplina at Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile under grant 11160038, and Fondecyt Regular under grant 1181575. Early drafts of this paper were presented at the panel Intimacies of Infrastructure organized by Penny Harvey and hosted by the 2014 EASA conference in Milan, Italy and at a panel co-organized with David Tecklin at the 2016 Latin American Congress of Political Ecology in San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. We would like to thank Julian Moraga, and Francisca de la Maza for their support during early stages of research. Further logistic support for this article came from Centro de Desarollo Local (Cedel) of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica (Villarrica). |
| We would like to acknowledge the members of Guia Grupo Ca?i for facilitating our research, and our many generous interviewees in southern Chile. Research for this article was supported by CIIR under grant CONICYT/FONDAP/15110006, VRI Interdisciplina at Pontificia Universidad Cat?lica de Chile under grant II160038, and Fondecyt Regular under grant 1181575. Early drafts of this paper were presented at the panel Intimacies of Infrastructure organized by Penny Harvey and hosted by the 2014 EASA conference in Milan, Italy and at a panel co-organized with David Tecklin at the 2016 Latin American Congress of Political Ecology in San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. We would like to thank Julian Moraga, and Francisca de la Maza for their support during early stages of research. Further logistic support for this article came from Centro de Desarollo Local (Cedel) of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica (Villarrica). |